Terence Crawford, Gervonta Davis, and Charlo Roped In as Demetrious Andrade Rips Apart Canelo Alvarez for Allegedly Avoiding Him and David Benavidez

In a recent bombshell interview, Demetrius Andrade threw a curveball at the boxing world. He openly questioned Canelo Alvarez’s choice of opponents. Specifically, he targeted Alvarez’s apparent reluctance to face top contenders like himself and David Benavidez. Andrade’s remarks came just days before his showdown with Benavidez, adding an unexpected twist to the narrative. The interview, conducted by Fighthype, revealed more than just pre-fight jitters.

It peeled back the layers of Alvarez’s strategic moves in the boxing hierarchy. Andrade, an undefeated American boxer, didn’t hold back. He insinuated that Alvarez’s decisions might be more about avoidance than challenge. His comments roped in other big names: Terence Crawford, Gervonta Davis, and Charlo. This inclusion hints at a broader critique of the sport’s current dynamics.

Demetrius Andrade sheds light on Canelo’s controversial picks

In the core of Demetrius Andrade’s explosive interview, he highlighted a critical point: Canelo Alvarez’s decision to fight Jermell Charlo over him or David Benavidez. Andrade articulated his perspective with a sense of bewilderment and accusation. He said, “I honestly don’t know because when he wanted to do this 168 thing he made sure everybody that was at 168 pounds with a championship belt said don’t fight for the year. No don’t nobody fight, we’re going to fight.” This statement underscores Canelo’s influence in the division and his tactical choices.

Andrade then shifted focus to Canelo’s current trajectory, stating, “He’s not doing that here; we don’t know what he’s doing. He’s trying to fight Charlo and Terence Crawford. And then what, Tank Davis?” His tone mixed incredulity with criticism, suggesting that Canelo’s priorities lay elsewhere, away from the top contenders in the super-middleweight division.

“I ain’t mad at him, but like he had plenty of opportunity to fight me and he had opportunity to fight David already,” he remarked. This portion of the conversation not only questioned Canelo’s choices but also highlighted missed opportunities. Andrade’s frankness and directness in the interview provided a sharp critique of Canelo’s decision-making, questioning his willingness to take on the toughest challenges in the sport.

Andrade challenges Canelo’s claim to supremacy

In a striking critique, Andrade recently challenged Alvarez’s standing as the undisputed super middleweight champion. His assertions, circulated widely on social media, accused Canelo of strategic opportunism rather than genuine dominance. Andrade pointedly remarked, “He (Canelo) has the luxury to do whatever it is that he is doing. Is fighting the undisputed at 154 what makes you the best?”

Andrade questioned Canelo’s avoidance of him and David Benavidez. He highlighted Canelo’s decision to fight for the title vacated by Benavidez as a tactical move, not a testament to his supremacy. Andrade’s comments underline a growing sentiment in the boxing community, questioning whether Canelo’s path to becoming undisputed truly reflects his willingness to face all top-tier challengers.

Also Read: “2 Men That Scare Canelo Half to Death”: Fans Hyped Up as Face-Off Between David Benavidez and Demetrius Andrade Gets Heated Up

Andrade’s critique, rooted in the unfulfilled potential of high-caliber matchups, casts a shadow of doubt over Canelo’s title claims. Consequently, it begs the question: Does Canelo’s current legacy accurately reflect his prowess, or has he strategically navigated around formidable opponents like Andrade and Benavidez?

Watch this story: David Benavidez continues slamming Canelo Alvarez ahead of Andrade fight