F1 banned refueling of tanks since 2010. Subsequently, in order to reduce the cost and also to increase safety, the FIA decided to ban it. So the F1 On race cars will follow the recent regulation that will enhance the race with a full tank of fuel.
According to Romain Grosjean, the Haas F1 team racer, bringing back the refueling system could be of great help for F1. It will have the opportunity to resolve and fix the GPDA’s issues.
He stated, “Yes, we want it,” Further added, “Not because we think it’s great for racing but because we need to bring the weight of the car down to help Pirelli. It’s a temporary fix for the car to be 70 kg lighter or 60 kg lighter. It’s one of the reasons we are overheating the car like crazy.”
In addition, he remarked on the advantages of re-introducing the rule. He asserted, “Yes. It will help the tires which is the big weakness.”
Further, there are several other theories from different drivers. Most of them spectated the era of refueling and support the refueling of cars.
According to the racers’ opinions, it is safer and more convenient to race with the light weighted car. Subsequently, it makes racing more comfortable, lowering down the risk factor too, in an aspect of tire dramas.
Many proposed to have a meeting over the F1 strategy group. Further, in 2017, in order to ensure to enhance and Prove the show. Subsequently, all the ideas did not reach the aspired destination.
In the debate of refueling of cockpits in between races, pros and cons came up under the light. The argument in favor of refueling did not exceed the ones opposing it.
It would be impossible to dispute the fact that the cost and safety drawbacks. Nevertheless, it would also be extremely difficult to argue that refueling would not make the cars quicker either. A lighter car is quicker for starting a race. Cockpits with 50 kilograms of fuel would be faster than the one starting at 100 kilograms.
As per the current maximum allowance. It would not make much difference if the lighter load allowed the driver to push his tires a little harder to tune on half of a second per lap.
From the driver’s point of view, they would love to have a quicker, but they’re not the ones watching the races, so it doesn’t much make any difference to the ones viewing it. It would be incredibly unfair to put the recent upturn of moves down solely to the banning of refueling. The arrival of three new teams in 2010 influenced the figures, while Pirelli’s designed-to-degrade tires and the DRS (Drag Reduction System) overtaking aid both arrived in 2011 and turned the whole sport on its head.
But it would be equally wrong to say refueling didn’t have any adverse impact on overtaking. Statistics can paint a misleading picture, but it’s rare for such a vast quantity of data to fail to give a truthful overall trend, and the view that refueling harms overtaking is backed up by a number of very experienced senior figures inside F1.
Formula One needs to attract new fans and henceforth the focus is on creating a greater impact on close racing with greater competition all the way through the field and bags on tracks action. This idea of banning refueling was also for creating chances for the struggling teams. Further, to avoid the danger for the pit crew members and racers in the cockpit too.
Read More: Do F1 Cars have a Clutch?