Home/MLB
feature-image
feature-image

It began with a spark not from Juan Soto’s bat, but from a stray comment during ESPN’s Sunday Night Baseball. As fans settled in to watch the Mets take the field, a broadcaster offhandedly implied that Soto might be flying separately from his teammates, as in, on a private jet. Within moments, the internet erupted. Forums lit up, group chats buzzed, and suddenly everyone had a hot take on Soto’s supposed “diva clause.” Was it true? Did Steve Cohen’s blank check extend 35,000 feet into the sky?

The narrative practically wrote itself. Soto, the $765 million man, was riding in solitude while the rest of the Mets flew coach (or at least charter). In a season already packed with headlines, this one felt like it had legs. It fed into every stereotype about superstar egos, deep-pocketed franchises, and a Mets team desperate to deliver. But here’s the thing — none of it was true.

To clear up what others have asserted: Juan Soto does not fly separately from his New York Mets teammates on a private jet,” Mets official Jeff Passan clarified after the broadcast buzz. “He flies on the team plane. There is no private-jet provision in his contract for him or his family.” And just like that, the flames were doused, though not before scorching plenty of credibility.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

So, how did such a flimsy claim catch fire in the first place? It’s all about timing and perception. Soto had just backed out of an in-game mic’d-up segment, a decision that, on its own, had already ruffled feathers. Pair that with a casual mention of private flights, and it felt to some like a pattern. Was Soto too big-time for the Mets? The answer: not even close.

If anything, this mini-controversy reveals more about the nature of modern fandom than it does about Soto himself. In an era where clips go viral in seconds and context is an afterthought, a tossed-off remark can become canon. It’s a reminder that not every story soaring across social media is grounded in fact.

So no, Juan Soto doesn’t fly above the team, metaphorically or literally. He’s on the plane, in the same cabin, chasing the same goal. Let’s save the private jets for offseason vacations.

What’s your perspective on:

Does the Soto jet rumor reveal more about media sensationalism or fan gullibility?

Have an interesting take?

Juan Soto’s Jet rumor sends fans spiraling

Before the truth had a chance to buckle its seatbelt, fans were already mid-takeoff. The second the ESPN broadcaster Karl Ravech’s comment about Juan Soto’s alleged private jet hit the airwaves, Mets Twitter lit up like Citi Field on fireworks night. No one hit pause to fact-check because who wouldn’t believe the idea of Soto cruising solo at 40,000 feet? In a fanbase trained to expect chaos, this wasn’t just news. It was gasoline on a spark.

No one officially reported that Juan Soto flew separately; that’s what makes this whole saga so ridiculous. The claim came from a casual, unsourced comment during ESPN’s Sunday Night Baseball broadcast. It wasn’t based on a report, contract clause, or insider tip. Just a broadcaster speculating on air, and suddenly it snowballed into a full-blown narrative about Soto getting diva treatment. In reality, Soto isn’t that guy, he’s not flying solo on a luxury jet while the rest of the Mets board coaches.

There’s more to unpack here than just a jet rumor because this fits into a bigger pattern. As per the user, certain corners of the Yankee-friendly media have been pushing the idea that Juan Soto isn’t happy with the Mets, spinning every minor moment into “proof” he regrets the move. It’s why Soto keeps his distance from reporters, every interaction turns into another Judge comparison or a question about why he didn’t pick the Bronx. The private jet charter was just the latest excuse to stir the pot. It’s not that Soto’s a diva, it’s that he’s tired of being baited by a narrative he never asked for.

It’s true there’s no official clause in Juan Soto’s contract about private jet perks, but that doesn’t rule out the possibility of a quiet handshake deal. With Steve Cohen at the helm, nothing’s off the table, especially when it comes to player comfort. Could there be special travel accommodations for Soto’s family behind the scenes? Maybe. Cohen has the resources and the reputation for going the extra mile, especially for a superstar of Soto’s caliber. Just because it’s not on paper doesn’t mean it’s not happening; it just means it’s not public.

That kind of reaction says it all. The second Jeff Passan tweeted out that clarification, some fans immediately joked that he must be on the Soto payroll. It wasn’t just about correcting the record anymore; to them, it felt like a coordinated cleanup job. After a full news cycle of wild takes and clubhouse drama theories, the timing of that tweet made it look less like reporting and more like PR damage control, and fans weren’t shy about calling it out.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

This whole thing might just be the media’s next great illusion, a narrative so out there, it’s almost impressive. I mean, think about it: who really believes the Mets are shelling out \$20–50 million for private flights just for Juan Soto and his family? That’s not just absurd, it’s financially reckless, especially since any off-the-books perk like that would count against the luxury tax and cost Steve Cohen nearly double thanks to the 110% surcharge. It’s not a flex, it’s fiscal sabotage. Yet somehow, it still took off.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

In the end, it was all smoke, no fire, just a stray comment that spiraled into chaos. Juan Soto flies with the team, not above it, and no private jet clause exists. Sometimes, all it takes is one careless rumor to test the sanity of Mets Nation.

ADVERTISEMENT

0
  Debate

Does the Soto jet rumor reveal more about media sensationalism or fan gullibility?

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT