
USA Today via Reuters
Nov 20, 2016; Los Angeles, CA, USA; Los Angeles Lakers President Jeanie Buss before the game against the Chicago Bulls at Staples Center. Bulls won 118-110. Mandatory Credit: Jayne Kamin-Oncea-USA TODAY Sports

USA Today via Reuters
Nov 20, 2016; Los Angeles, CA, USA; Los Angeles Lakers President Jeanie Buss before the game against the Chicago Bulls at Staples Center. Bulls won 118-110. Mandatory Credit: Jayne Kamin-Oncea-USA TODAY Sports
An NBA journalist has publicly responded after the Los Angeles Lakers organization threatened legal action to prevent the release of his new book detailing the inner workings of the franchise during the LeBron James era, leading to a dramatic confrontation between the writer and the team’s legal team.
Watch What’s Trending Now!
Yaron Weitzman issued a strong clarification on social media following reports about the Lakers’ legal threats. “So I feel the need to clarify something here, since no response from me is in the report below: This description of my reporting is, obviously, INCREDIBLY inaccurate,” the journalist stated. He emphasized the thorough nature of his research process for the project.
The author revealed he conducted extensive interviews while working on “A Hollywood Ending: The Dreams and Drama of the LeBron Lakers.” “I interviewed nearly 300 people over the course of three years,” Weitzman explained. He defended the book’s balanced approach, noting “The book is not a hit-job in any way, and you don’t have to take my word for it.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
So I feel the need to clarify something here, since no response from me is in the report below:
This description of my reporting is, obviously, INCREDIBLY inaccurate. I interviewed nearly 300 people over the course of three years. The book is not a hit-job in any way, and you… https://t.co/6RHsPBou0j
— Yaron Weitzman (@YaronWeitzman) October 27, 2025
The journalist pointed readers toward independent reviews to validate his claims about the book’s fairness. His public statement marks the latest development in an ongoing dispute between the writer and the prestigious NBA franchise over the book’s content and characterization of team operations.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Weitzman’s book examined the modern Lakers era through multiple lenses. The project explored the power dynamics among the Buss children and the growing influence of LeBron James’ business ventures within the organization.
The journalist followed standard publishing protocol by sending fact-checking materials to the principals involved. This routine process triggered the Lakers’ legal response rather than the expected cooperative dialogue. Weitzman maintained that he absolutely did not defame owner Jeanie Buss or the Lakers organization in his work.
The conflict escalated when the Lakers organization hired prominent defamation attorney Marty Singer to represent their interests. Weitzman described the legal pressure he faced during the book’s fact-checking phase. Instead of standard communications, the team opted for formal legal representation to address their concerns.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Lakers’ Legal Confrontation
The conflict escalated when the Lakers hired renowned defamation attorney Marty Singer to represent their side. Weitzman described the legal pressure he faced during the book’s fact-checking phase. Instead of standard communications, the team opted for formal legal representation to address their concerns.

Imago
Credit: IMAGN IMAGES
Attorney Marty Singer sent a strongly worded legal letter to Weitzman outlining the team’s objections. The document claimed the journalist’s reporting was “Full of thinly-veiled misogynistic smears, revealing a chauvinism and negative bias that undermines the reliability of your sources.” These accusations formed the basis of the potential legal action.
Singer delivered a clear warning about the organization’s willingness to pursue litigation. “I want to be incredibly clear with you. There are many times when individuals threaten to sue with neither the reputation to stand up to scrutiny nor the resources to pursue a strong libel claim. Please have no doubt neither of these issues apply here,” the attorney stated in his correspondence.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT


