Home/NFL
feature-image

via Imago

feature-image

via Imago

“The Tush Push does not matter to me,” Trevor Lawrence quipped, leaning back with the calm of a QB who’s weathered more storms than a Florida hurricane. “That’s one play an entire game, and if we let one play beat us [that means] we’ve got way more to worry about than a Tush Push.” The Jaguars’ $275 million man isn’t sweating Philly’s party trick—even if it’s bulldozed his squad twice.

But as the NFL’s owners huddle up to vote on banning the play this week, Lawrence’s chill vibes clash with the Packers’ full-court press to erase it from the playbook. Cue the drama: this isn’t just about a glorified rugby scrum. It’s a turf war over tradition, innovation, and whether football’s soul can survive its own evolution.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Let’s rewind. The ‘Tush Push’—Philly’s not-so-secret sauce—is football’s ultimate cheat code. Picture Jalen Hurts, a human battering ram with a 600-pound squat, getting rocket-boosted by his O-line like a Madden glitch come to life. The Eagles converted 39 of 48 attempts last season, a success rate that’s more automatic than a PAT.

But here’s the kicker: when Jacksonville faced Philly in Week 9 last fall, their D-line did the unthinkable—twice. They stonewalled the unstoppable. “If you don’t like it, get better at stopping it,” Saquon Barkley snapped, channeling his inner Game of Thrones villain. “Everyone tries it, we’re just super successful at it.”

When the push comes to shove Lawrence: A ban that’s more than just buttinskis

Yet Green Bay’s gripe isn’t just sour grapes. Their revised proposal—a throwback to 1920s rules banning any push/pull aid—wouldn’t just nerf the Tush Push; it’d Thanos-snap it from existence. “There’s no skill involved,” Packers CEO Mark Murphy grumbled, nostalgia-dripping like Lambeau’s frozen tundra.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

“Bring back the traditional QB sneak. That worked pretty well for Bart Starr… in the Ice Bowl.” Cute. But here’s the plot twist: the NFL’s own data found zero injury spikes from the play. So why the fuss? Because Philly’s mastery turned a gimmick into gospel—and nobody likes a meta that’s too meta.

What’s your perspective on:

Is the 'Tush Push' a genius innovation or a cheap trick ruining football's integrity?

Have an interesting take?

article-image

via Imago

For Lawrence, whose 0-2 record against Philly includes a 40.9 passer rating in 2024’s heartbreaker, the Tush Push is a footnote, not a thesis. “We’ve got way more to worry about,” he shrugs. And he’s right. Jacksonville’s 22-38 record under his watch isn’t on Philly’s playbook—it’s on stalled drives, injury bugs, and the grind of lifting a franchise still chasing its ’90s glory. But the NFL’s never been about logic. It’s about vibes. And right now, 16 owners are vibing like The Purge voters, itching to ax the play that broke their brains.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Will the ban stick? If it does, Philly’s got a contingency—probably something involving Hurts, a trampoline, and a loophole the size of Lincoln Financial Field. But this isn’t just about rules. It’s about football’s eternal tug-of-war between old-school grit and new-school gritting your teeth. Lawrence? He’ll keep slinging spirals, contract secured, AC joint healed, eyes on the real prize: making Jacksonville believe in magic again. Because in the end, the Tush Push is just a play. But the game? The game’s a poem—and every snap’s a chance to rewrite it.

ADVERTISEMENT

0
  Debate

"Is the 'Tush Push' a genius innovation or a cheap trick ruining football's integrity?"

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT