
via Reuters
Tennis – WTA Finals – Cancun, Mexico – November 3, 2023 Coco Gauff of the U.S. in action during her group stage match against Czech Republic’s Marketa Vondrousova REUTERS/Henry Romero

via Reuters
Tennis – WTA Finals – Cancun, Mexico – November 3, 2023 Coco Gauff of the U.S. in action during her group stage match against Czech Republic’s Marketa Vondrousova REUTERS/Henry Romero
Remember when Coco Gauff played Laura Siegemund at the 2023 US Open? On multiple occasions, when the American stepped up to serve, Siegemund wasn’t ready. After letting it slide a few times, Gauff decided enough was enough. She yelled at the umpire, “I don’t care what she’s doing on her serve, but on my serve she has to be ready. She’s never ready.” Although Gauff had a point, many criticized her for how she handled the situation. Now, after another altercation with a chair umpire at the Dubai Tennis Championships, the tennis community is on her side.
It happened during Coco Gauff’s round of 16 match against Karolina Pliskova. After losing the first set, the 19-year-old was serving at 4-2 in the second. She made a first serve, but chair umpire Pierre Bacchi called it out almost a second after Pliskova hit the ball out. Hawkeye confirmed it was in. It should’ve been Gauff’s point, considering the call couldn’t have affected Pliskova’s return. However, the umpire didn’t think so.
Forcing her to replay the point, Gauff was having none of it. Understandably furious, she asked Bacchi to call the supervisor. But he rejected the request. That didn’t sit well with the American or the tennis community. It led to almost a five-minute argument, with Gauff even saying, “It’s not a feeling, it’s a fact. Everybody knows you called it after [Pliskova hit the ball].” Even though things didn’t go her way then, she didn’t let it deter her.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Sealing the set 6-4 and the third set 6-3, she made her way into the quarterfinals. During her on-court interview, Gauff seemed to have put the incident in the past. “I think it just fueled me. I wanna watch back the video. I feel confident that it was after. It’s ok. It’s just one point. It happens in tennis. Players make mistakes. Everybody makes mistakes. It kind of went upward from there for me,” she said.
Coco should've sat down cuz WTF. pic.twitter.com/pkQ16RioXH
— Ilithiophobic. (@Stevies_Wonder) February 21, 2024
The tennis circuit will feature automated line calling permanently from 2025. But till then, with the usual rules in place, tournaments like the Dubai Tennis Championships will have human line judges and the traditional hawkeye method. In this situation, while it’s true that the judgment call lies with the umpire, it’s also true that Gauff had the right to talk to the supervisor. So, when The Tennis Letter posted the entire exchange on X, fans made their case in support of the World No.3.
Watch This Story | Hilarious Meaning of Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, Novak Djokovic, and Serena Williams on Urban Dictionary!
Coco Gauff’s case was an “abuse of authority” by the chair umpire
It’s not uncommon to see coaches and former players come out in support of players when situations like these arise. Watching the whole argument unfold, Serena Williams’ former coach, Rennae Stubbs, couldn’t sit back and say nothing. She explained how the umpire was in the wrong while also laying out what would’ve been the situation had the supervisor come out.
The umpire is correct in saying it’s a judgement call & his to make. The other correct thing is Coco has EVERY RIGHT to ask for the super visor & he should have called her & the supervisor should have then come out to explain that she can’t change the decision. BS from him & rude
— Rennae Stubbs 🇦🇺👍🏼 (@rennaestubbs) February 21, 2024
She didn’t stop there, though. Stubbs continued, “Oh, and may I add, he was also WRONG! @CocoGauff very rarely loses it like this unless she feels wronged, exhibit A.” A fan brought up the same thing, calling it an “abuse of authority.”
This seems Exhibit A of Abuse of Authority
IF a player has Right to ask for Supervisor
THEN umpire MUST act in accordance with Rule just as all players must act in accordance with all RULES or face consequences.
This is simple and @WTA should immediately clarify.
2nd Pliskova? pic.twitter.com/Fy3KUduqfy— Adam Evan Weinberg (@AdamEWeinberg) February 21, 2024
When it comes to the chair umpire in question – Pierre Bacchi – this isn’t the first time he’s been involved in a controversy. During the 2021 French Open semi-final between Barbora Krejčíková and Maria Sakkari, the Greek player hit the ball long when Krejčíková had match point. She believed it was out, and the linesperson thought so, too. Even TV replays confirmed it. However, Bacchi disagreed and reversed the call. Although Krejčíková subsequently won, Bacchi’s call introduced a controversy.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Considering this and similar cases, a fan wrote, “What a doughnut of a referee. Gosh. So pigheaded and insecure he couldn’t call the supervisor. Let me see this nonsense happen on the ATP side. Absolutely disgusting @WTA get better refs!!!” Another fan echoed this sentiment, calling the umpire out for his bad call.
They wrote, “That umpire is a tyrant and shouldn’t be able to call any more tennis matches. The way he handled that situation was pathetic. Coco was in the right.” Agreeing with them, a user appreciated Gauff’s composure throughout the exchange. They also mentioned that he kept interrupting the player when she was making her case. “Right. @CocoGauff was so clear and calm. He just kept cutting her off. Didn’t want to listen. awful treatment.”
While a user pointed out that Coco Gauff asked for the supervisor 35 times throughout the argument, another fan showed their support by making light of the situation with a dig at the umpire. “Why is he not calling the supervisor? Guess who is getting a demotion from the establishment after this match 🤣,” they wrote.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
The reactions express that Gauff’s decision to call for a supervisor was justified. However, despite her logic being perfect, she was rejected. Nonetheless, the tennis community stood by the 19-year-old and showed their disapproval of the umpire. What is your take on Coco Gauff’s case?
Read more: Coco Gauff Saves 2 Match Points and Earns a Second-Round Ticket at WTA Dubai 2021
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT