
via Imago
TENNIS AUSTRALIAN OPEN, Novak Djokovic of Serbia celebrates after winning his match against Alex de Minaur of Australia during the 2023 Australian Open tennis tournament at Melbourne Park in Melbourne, Monday, January 23, 2023. ACHTUNG: NUR REDAKTIONELLE NUTZUNG, KEINE ARCHIVIERUNG UND KEINE BUCHNUTZUNG MELBOURNE VICTORIA AUSTRALIA PUBLICATIONxINxGERxSUIxAUTxONLY Copyright: xJOELxCARRETTx 20230123001755830081

via Imago
TENNIS AUSTRALIAN OPEN, Novak Djokovic of Serbia celebrates after winning his match against Alex de Minaur of Australia during the 2023 Australian Open tennis tournament at Melbourne Park in Melbourne, Monday, January 23, 2023. ACHTUNG: NUR REDAKTIONELLE NUTZUNG, KEINE ARCHIVIERUNG UND KEINE BUCHNUTZUNG MELBOURNE VICTORIA AUSTRALIA PUBLICATIONxINxGERxSUIxAUTxONLY Copyright: xJOELxCARRETTx 20230123001755830081
After Djokovic’s big 378 weeks at no.1, whether he or Graf is the all-time No. 1 is a matter of opinion. However, by introducing a new metric to compare the two players, Pam Shriver sparked an important conversation about how we measure greatness in tennis. Shriver took to her Twitter account to talk about this new metric, and true to the nature of tennis fans, her tweet was flooded with comments and retweets.
Fans are divided in their stance of siding with Shriver’s metric of comparing the percentage number of weeks to decide on the greatness between two players. What’s more, some players have also come up with their own metrics of deciding on who is the greatest player based on their #1 ranking. While the tennis world remains divided over this metric, Djokovic fans are busy celebrating his new success.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Pam Shriver suggests a new way to rank tennis players like Novak Djokovic and Steffi Graf
Novak Djokovic recently broke Steffi Graf’s record for the most weeks at world No. 1, but former tennis player Pam Shriver believes that there should be a new metric to compare the two players. Shriver argues that the total number of weeks at world No. 1 should not be the only criteria to determine the all-time No. 1. Instead, she proposes a new metric: the percentage of total weeks spent at No. 1.
Read more: Novak Djokovic Beams With Pride After Making Serious Confession About Roger Federer and Steffi Graf
Tennis enthusiasts on Twitter have lapped up the conversation, and it is all they’re talking about on Twitter right now.
Paul McNamee simply pointed out that this metric is “not the way to go.”
Pam I think comparing men’s and women’s records in sport is, quite simply, not the way to go
— 🎗️ Paul McNamee (@PaulFMcNamee) March 1, 2023
Another fan drew out the math in order to explain their stance.
The minimum amount of sets needed for a woman to win a Grand Slam exc. retirements/walkovers is 14, men’s is 21.
Using that logic we should add at least another 33% to Novak Djokovic’s Grand Slam count so in reality he has at minimum 29 Grand Slams.
I hope this helps.
— Jason (@Certinfy) February 28, 2023
Many fans have also pointed out how, if Shriver’s metric is taken into consideration, it would be Monica Seles at the top instead of Steffi Graf.
As long as that number is adjusted for the absence of Monica Seles when she appeared to be peaking, having beaten Graf in several finals. https://t.co/x9ANiq6Hir
— Doug Bandow (@Doug_Bandow) March 1, 2023
Another tennis enthusiast has simply pointed out that this tweet aims to “provoke” Djokovic fans.
The purpose of this ridiculous tweet is simply to provoke. Don’t fall for it #Nolefam. People like this just like to play victim in saying how we all came after them. https://t.co/3octpUz1tU
— Kristina (@KrisSekMNT) March 1, 2023
While some fans have sided with Shriver, most are against her percentage metric.
Pam as usual your input carries great value👏
Novak should never be mentioned in the same sentence as Steffi, EVER! Graf retired after 17 years with 22 GST and Olympic Gold Medal in 88.
Novak after 17 years had 17 GST and needed an additional 3 years to get to 22, END OF STORY!— dc0531 (@dougwc1) February 28, 2023
Others have directly trolled Shriver for her suggestion.
Pam, a serious question:
Are you born this stupid or something happened along the way? You know men play at best or 5 while women don't, right? You should give men an extra 33% bonus to even dare comparing the two. But I guess you're just too dumb to even think about that. #Sftu https://t.co/mAFVCAwbLq— Μ Δ Ж (@MR_Max75) March 1, 2023
She is so so so so so so bad at her job, imagine embarrassing yourself like this
— NR7 (@BasedTennis) March 1, 2023
I think even Steffi Graf is embarrassed reading this. https://t.co/BI9xJ6htP9
— Serbian Football (@SerbianFooty) February 28, 2023
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Does this metric really work?
Some fans believe Shriver’s proposal for a new metric is a compelling one. By looking at the percentage of total weeks spent at No. 1, we can compare players across eras and tours in a more meaningful way.
This metric would also take into account the differences between the men’s and women’s tours, and provide a more accurate reflection of a player’s dominance. However, the fact that she tried to root for Graf over Djokovic, who just broke the record, sounded “desperate” to some fans.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
What do you think about this tweet? Let us know in the comments.
WATCH THIS STORY – Serena Williams’ Ex-coach Patrick Mouratoglou Launches Fresh Controversy as He Irks Rafael Nadal Fans With a Biased Novak Djokovic Statement
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT