Team USA left Medinah with the Presidents Cup, but Brandt Snedeker’s celebration drew an immediate challenge. As the captain pushed back against a familiar criticism of his players, Brandel Chamblee was not ready to let the result settle the argument.
Watch What’s Trending Now!
Snedeker’s defense went beyond the score. After the 17-13 victory, he said he was tired of hearing that his players “aren’t close” and that the Americans “can’t play team golf.” Their comeback, he argued, proved both criticisms wrong. Chamblee did not dispute the players’ bond. He questioned whether a singles comeback answered the criticism of their play in pairs.
“So they made a mistake, and they lost. So I understand they don’t like the criticism, but the criticism, you don’t get to just take the money and run. Your criticism comes with the territory. You’re a team.”
That was the heart of Chamblee’s argument. He did not suggest that Americans dislike each other or that their locker room is fractured. In fact, he rejected that idea altogether, saying he had never seen an American team that was genuinely divided. The criticism, he argued, has always been about something more specific: how the Americans perform when they have to play together.
Medinah gave him plenty to point to. The U.S. won Thursday’s fourballs 3-2, only to be swept 5-0 in Friday’s foursomes. They recovered on Saturday morning’s fourballs, winning 2.5-1.5, but the afternoon foursomes ended 2-2. By the time the team sessions finished, the International team held a 10.5-7.5 lead. It was the first time the Internationals had ever carried a lead into the ultimate day against the US on American soil.
Snedeker took responsibility for the deficit. Speaking to NBC’s Cara Banks after Saturday’s play, he said he was “so proud of how they’ve kind of hung in there this week despite all of my mistakes.”
Asked to explain, he added, “I tried to work my tail off to put these guys in the best situation possible, and I don’t think I’ve done a very good job this week to be where we are right now.”
He said the players “look to me to put them in the best position where they’re comfortable,” before admitting, “I don’t think I’ve held up my end of the bargain.”
After the comeback, Kevin Kisner said the captaincy asks golfers who have spent their careers making decisions for themselves to suddenly put a team first. He also called for someone to help the captain with “messaging, interviews, and team culture building,” arguing that such support could have helped Snedeker handle his interview with Cara Banks.
Even Scottie Scheffler’s role became part of the conversation. The world No. 1, 1-8 in foursomes across the Ryder and Presidents Cups, sat out Saturday afternoon’s foursomes, a decision that inevitably raised questions about how the Americans were approaching the format.
Then came the singles, and everything changed.
The Americans won Sunday’s singles 9.5-2.5, with nine wins, one halved match and two losses. Jacob Bridgeman secured the Cup by beating Min Woo Lee 1 up on the 18th hole. The result completed the largest final-day comeback in Presidents Cup history and gave the U.S. the biggest singles-session margin the event has seen.
Chamblee was quick to recognize the scale of it, calling the performance the greatest Sunday singles showing by a U.S. team in either the Presidents Cup or Ryder Cup. His praise did not change his objection: the Americans had erased the deficit in singles, not in the partner formats that prompted the criticism.
That is why, for Chamblee, the Ryder Cup remains impossible to ignore.
At Bethpage Black last year, the U.S. entered Sunday trailing Europe 11.5-4.5. The Americans won singles 8.5-3.5, but the rally was not enough to prevent a 15-13 defeat. Europe had built its lead across the four foursomes and fourball sessions, which is why Chamblee saw the Ryder Cup result reflected in what happened at Medinah: American strength in singles could not erase questions about their play with partners.
His criticism goes beyond the players themselves. Chamblee argued that the Americans’ preparation at Bethpage was also part of the problem, saying they were “beaten by their data.” His contention was that captain Keegan Bradley cut the rough down, leaving the iconic, brawny Bethpage Black course virtually “toothless.”
He contrasted that group with previous U.S. teams built around players such as Tiger Woods and Dustin Johnson, whose driving accuracy and power were better suited to that kind of test.
Even if not every part of that assessment is accepted, it explains why Chamblee went beyond merely stating that the Americans need to play better in his comments. His larger point is that criticism is to identify a weakness, and winning does not automatically erase that weakness.
The Americans did what they needed to do at Medinah. They fell behind, survived the team sessions, and then overwhelmed the Internationals in singles. Snedeker therefore has every reason to be proud of what his team accomplished. But Chamblee is asking a different question: did the victory actually resolve the concern about American team golf?
For him, the answer lies in the formats that have caused the problems. If the Americans want the questions to disappear, they need to start winning consistently in fourballs and foursomes, particularly against Europe, where the stakes will be even higher when the Ryder Cup arrives at Adare Manor in Ireland next year.
Medinah did two things at once. It gave the Americans another Presidents Cup and another reason to celebrate, while also giving their critics another example of the same pattern: struggle in the team sessions, dominance in singles. Chamblee’s point is not that the Americans cannot win. They clearly can.
His point is that until they demonstrate the same level of performance when playing alongside a partner, the debate over American team golf is unlikely to disappear.