Golf Legend Jack Nicklaus ‘Was Essentially Saved’ From Tarnishing His ‘Legacy and Reputation’ by Changing His Loyalty, a Report Claimed Earlier This Year

$100 million is the offer the veteran golfer Jack Nicklaus turned down from LIV Golf when they approached him to decorate the designation of its CEO. Notably, the 82-year-old revealed PGA Tour loyalism as the reason for declining the offer, twice. However, is it really the truth? Was he forced to do it? 

In a Sports Illustrated article from earlier this year, it was revealed that the Nicklaus companies, which the 18-time major champion built, has filed a case against him. And one of the three allegations by the company suggests that Nicklaus’ decision to turn down LIV Golf’s offer was not his own. 

His company saved Jack Nicklaus from facing a major setback of his career at 82

According to the complaint, the company had paid the veteran golfer $145 million in 2007 for providing exclusive services to them. Although he did follow the contract at the beginning, Jack Nicklaus failed to do so over time. 

One of the allegations the plaintiff had against the 73-time PGA Tour champion was his wrongful negotiation with PIF Saudi Investment Fund, the sponsor of the LIV Series. 

Notably, the LIV Series has received nothing but criticism since its inception. And one part of the case file explains how the company managed to save the face of the veteran golfer. “The Company essentially saved Mr. Nicklaus from himself by extricating him from a controversial project,” the file read. 

“Thanks to the intervention of Nicklaus Companies, the Company was able to minimize the fallout from the situation,” the case file further read. “And protect the goodwill and good name of both the Company and Mr. Nicklaus.” 

Read more: ‘Never Really Had a Conversation’: Jack Nicklaus Once Made a Sombre Confession About Tiger Woods

Notably, the former Australian golfer, Greg Norman, currently holds the position of LIV Golf CEO. And from the backlashes he has been facing since he started decorating the post, it is right to say that the Nicklaus Company did help its founder from tarnishing his image. 

Other allegations on the 18-time major champion

Compared to the LIV Golf issue, the other two allegations against Nicklaus are not big. Receiving payment from the 2022 Soudal Open, a DP World Tour event played in Belgium, was the first allegation against him. 

Meanwhile, the second was him being involved in a video game with the Masters and PGA Tour. Notably, it is all wrong in the eyes of the law since he signed an exclusive contract with his company in 2007. 

If not for the intervention from his company, Jack Nicklaus would have possibly been the leader of the Saudi-backed league. Do you think the PGA Tour and its players would have acted against the league if the CEO was Nicklaus? 

Watch This Story: Jack Nicklaus Supported Tiger Woods After His Honest Assessment of Donald Trump in 2018