Michael Chandler Says Dan Hooker Is ‘The Saltiest, Nastiest Fighter’

Michael Chandler finally has his debut fight in the UFC. While it could have been a title fight if the UFC 254 main event between Khabib Nurmagomedov and Justin Gaethje fell apart, that didn’t happen. Chandler was an alternate for that fight but now has a date and opponent for himself.

Chandler will be facing Dan Hooker on the UFC 257 card, which is headlined by Conor McGregor and Dustin Poirier. While many believe it is an easier test than the others people have suggested for Chandler, the man himself believes he has been dealt a harder fight.

“Truthfully, he may be one of the saltiest, nastiest, toughest challenges. Both physically and with his attributes inside the Octagon. I think I match up better with Poirier than with Hooker. With Gaethje than Hooker. I think I match up better with Tony Ferguson than I do Hooker.”

What he says about how he feels he matches up with Hooker vs the others is something only he can know. However, it would be a little bit hyperbolic to say Hooker is a worse matchup for him than Tony Ferguson, Gaethje, or Poirier. It is a tough challenge, but the others are just as tough if not tougher.

Michael Chandler: Is Hooker a bad matchup?

Dan Hooker is one of the best strikers in the UFC and a striking matchup won’t be the best outcome for Chandler. Even though Chandler himself is a very solid striker, he will have to employ his wrestling skills to definitively beat Hooker.

There is nothing particularly unconventional about this matchup, or anything that would make it worse on paper to someone like Poirier or Gaethje. After all, Gaethje is also one of the best strikers in the UFC, along with having a wrestling pedigree. Poirier literally beat Hooker in a five-round fight, proving his superiority over him.

Hopefully, Chandler is just trying to set the fight hype up by promoting Hooker as a valid opponent. If he builds Hooker up and then beats him, it works well for him. If he does that and loses, at least he promoted the guy who beat him as a genuine threat rather than being embarrassed with an upset loss.