“CIA Played a Role in the #JFKAssassination”: Danica Patrick Risks Outrage With Controversial Post on Social Media
Follow Us
Danica Patrick is among the most famous NASCAR drivers from the modern era. Her skills and abilities during her stints in the IndyCar Series as well as the Cup Series are big reasons for her fame. But to an extent, her views – brash and unapologetic at times – have also contributed to that fame; sometimes, to her infamy as well.
For those who follow NASCAR drivers religiously, Patrick’s views are no surprise. She has never bowed down to public opinion, choosing to stick with what she believes. But at times, this has ruffled feathers. In a society where having a non-conformist opinion is not appreciated, in some instances, she has found herself in trouble.
Regardless of that, she remains unhindered. That is visible from her recent sharing of an Instagram post on her story. The post by Tim Kennedy, an account that has 1.3 million followers, is one with a lot of potential for causing controversy.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Danica Patrick shows support for these theories
Tim wrote, “In the last month, we learned for a fact. -The CIA played a role in the #JFKAssassination and have lied about it for 60 years. -The FBI colluded with #Twitter hiding evidence of the #HunterBidensLaptop. -The CDC knew the #vaccines did not stop transmission and deceived us.”
In the last month we learned for a fact.
-The CIA played a role in the #JFKAssassination and have lied about it for 60 years.
-The FBI colluded with #Twitter hiding evidence of the #HunterBidensLaptop
-The CDC knew the #vaccines did not stop transmission and deceived us.— Tim Kennedy (@TimKennedyMMA) December 22, 2022
The post was also replicated on Kennedy’s Twitter account. He further added, “It’s almost as if our Government it’s working in the best interests of The People.” His profile defines him as a “UFC Fighter, Ranger, sniper, and Special Forces Operator. Unapologetically American, New York Times best selling author.”
All the topics mentioned in the post are bound to generate a lot of talk amongst the public.
Not the first time Patrick has had a hot take
Trending
Michael Jordans’ Entrepreneurial Drive Could Potentially Be the End of 23XI and Denny Hamlin’s Dream
May 02, 2024 10:39 AM EDT
Denny Hamlin Reveals the Harsh Reality That Awaits NASCAR At the End of 2024 – “We Just Wouldn’t Show up”
May 02, 2024 06:55 AM EDT
Sister Kelley & Jordan Fish React as Dale Jr’s Wife Sends Heart-melting Message on Their Daughter’s Special Day
May 01, 2024 09:05 PM EDT
Dale Earnhardt Jr Drops an Expletive Bomb as He Turns the Tables on Cup Teams Financial Outcry
May 03, 2024 08:19 AM EDT
Racing Community Goes Berserk as Tony Stewart Drops Surprising ‘Fans Double’ Announcement Amidst Indy Return
May 03, 2024 01:47 PM EDT
Get instantly notified of the hottest NASCAR stories via Google! Click on Follow Us and Tap the Blue Star.
Follow Us
Danica’s stance on topics like the assassination of former POTUS, John F Kennedy, and the potency of COVID-19 vaccines is not her first hot take. She has previously taken a contentious view on sex as well.
On her Pretty Intense podcast, she sat down with Chris Williamson and discussed topics like porn and sex. Williamson asked her, “Are you proposing the entire world limit having sex to just when women are ovulating?”
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
“No, when they’re not. Unless they want to have a baby.” Taken aback, Williamson further asked, “What would be the reason for that other than just for protection?” To this, the former driver replied, “Well, you wouldn’t have to be on birth control. So you would more safe from a pregnancy standpoint.”
“So the narrative changes around sex to being something that is done at specific times. You would now as a woman, track your cycle more. Men would too.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Watch This Story: Danica Patrick Once Had a Back-and-Forth With Country Musician Trace Adkins Days After Famously Not Being Able to Take a Joke at NASCAR Ceremony
These are quite strong views, which to some sections of the public might even seem regressive. Do you agree?