NASCAR deliberately walked away from decade-long elimination-style playoffs and returned to the Chase format for 2026. There’s no doubt that the new format is cleaner and more intuitive, and the “win-you’re-in” concept doesn’t exist anymore. looks like NASCAR has returned to the original 2004-2013 championship concept.

Watch What’s Trending Now!

With three races remaining in the regular season, 16 drivers field is taking shape. But one number continues to be in the spotlight of drama that everyone wants: No. 16, the Chase bubble. In a recent episode of NASCAR’s Inside the Race, Kyle Petty went straight forward and expressed how he doesn’t care about the Chase bubble.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I’m going to be the bad guy here. I don’t care. We spend so much time talking about the bubble every freaking year. That’s all we talk about: bubble, bubble, bubble. And as soon as we get to the playoffs, we never mention those guys again,” Petty said on the show. Backing this, NASCAR journalist Toby Christie also argued on X that Petty is right and called the 16th spot irrelevant. To this, his solution was, “Make the qualifying field 10 drivers if your want the bubble fight to truly mean something.”

Now, fast forward to today, echoing something similar to this, Dale Earnhardt Jr. has also voiced the argument of cutting the Chase field down to 10 or 12.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 16 driver Chase field has a problem

Dale Jr.’s central argument is straightforward: with 16 spots available from a field of 36 cars, a relatively large portion of serious contenders already knows it has a realistic path into the postseason. So the battle around spots around 16th doesn’t always feel like a true knock-out cut-off.

ADVERTISEMENT

“They’re gonna have 16 guys. Take a picture; take that picture. What are you gonna think? Are you gonna have the same reaction internally when you see it versus that 10? No, you got some extras.” Earnhardt Jr. said.

This is why the question matters even when the driver in 16th is competitive. The issue is not that that driver is unworthy; it is that the system may be too forgiving for the regular season to feel like a true elimination race for most of the year.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Does it really matter? Is it going to hurt anybody that Austin Cindric is sixteenth and going to be in the chase? No. It’s not going to hurt anybody. But if we want the cut line to be a conversation worth having at this point in the season, you’re going to have to move that cut line to twelfth or tenth. Because I’m telling you right now, if the cut line was tenth and you got Kyle Larson sitting on top of that, the broadcast is going to be on it.” Dale Jr. said on his Dale Jr. Download podcast posted on YouTube.

A smaller field would make the path to the championship much tighter. Under the current format, the Cup Series advances 16 drivers. So it’s obvious that NASCAR already uses different postseason sizes across the national series. But how is this relevant? It is relevant, and it indeed matters because it’s clear that NASCAR is willing to treat playoff access differently depending on the comparison level and field size.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dale Jr.’s hypothetical scenario of Kyle Larson sitting 10th late in the regular season captures the urgency and drama which is missing right now. If a championship favorite driver can actually miss the postseason, then every race will carry more cutline pressure and more consequences for mistakes. In that setup, the fight for 9th through 12th becomes a major storyline instead of a secondary one.

But there is also a nostalgia and perception issue

In the podcast, Earnhardt Jr. pointed out the original 2004 Chase, which first contained only 10 drivers. And the perception was immediate that those were the best drivers.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There’s a photo of the ten of us on the stage at Richmond back around ’04 after the race. It was like some wild west, all of us standing up there. We just ran 400 laps, and we’ve all kinda cooled off, and everybody is standing up there in their uniforms taking a picture of the first chase group. You look at that, and I know we get stuck in nostalgia and all that, but it’s… You look at each driver in that group, and you’re like, ‘f—k dude, legend. Bad a–. Oh, he was good. Oh, I remember that year he was kicking a—,” Earnhardt said on the podcast.

The photo taken after the Richmond cutoff race showed a group of names that felt elite. Jeff Gordon, Jimmie Johnson, Dale Earnhardt Jr., Kurt Busch, Tony Stewart, and Mark Martin were among those 10 drivers. And yes, the perception was naturally straightforward that they were the best.

ADVERTISEMENT

“And then you now at the end of this, right before the chase at the end of the regular season, they’re gonna have sixteen guys. Take a picture [of today], take that picture. What are you gonna think? Are you gonna have the same reaction internally when you see it versus that ten?” Dale Jr. further added.

The 16-driver field includes more drivers who compiled some solid regular seasons without ever looking like true title contenders. The Chase starts to feel less like an exclusive championship and more like an inclusive championship. Some, for sure, argue that the postseason should reward a larger group of organizations and give more teams a realistic chance at postseason money and exposure.

A 16-driver field is more inclusive, but it can blur the line between a good regular season and a real title threat because the drivers who were solid but not really dominant remain in the race for the championship. And a 10-driver Chase would sharpen that line immediately and bring a sense of exclusivity.

ADVERTISEMENT

The mathematical argument: 10 Chase drivers & 10 Chase races

Dale Jr.’s preferred model is elegant in its simplicity: 10 drivers for 10 races. Every driver who makes it to the field has a meaningful reason to be there, and every race inside the chase carries weight, compared to the current structure of 16 drivers competing over the same 10 races. Six drivers are effectively entering the championship tournament despite having produced regular seasons that, by standard, have not necessarily demonstrated championship-level form, according to Dale Jr.

“When we were doing the committee, I was voting for however many races we have in this chase; that’s however many drivers we should have. I mean, it’ll be ramped up. Ten drivers, ten races—like it would be so good,” Dale Jr. said.

The logic is easy to understand and easy for broadcasters to sell. The flip side is that 16 drivers and 10 races feel mismatched. But this is where the idea of pure sport comes to a halt, and then it’s all pure business. NASCAR’s postseason is not just about winning a trophy; it’s a financial event, and teams can significantly benefit from qualifying for it. Reducing the field from 16 to 10 means taking away the opportunities from the 6 teams that they might have gotten after the postseason.

Dale Earnhardt Jr. himself has acknowledged this obstacle. NASCAR is not simply deciding how many drivers should race for a championship. It is deciding how many organizations and teams get access to exposure and sponsorships. For big organizations and teams like Joe Gibbs Racing, Hendrick Motorsports, and Team Penske, missing the championship chase can be painful, but they can survive it. For smaller teams, making it to the postseason can help them in many monetary ways. So a smaller field could make the championship more prestigious while also making the sport less financially accessible.

What does NASCAR want the Chase field to look like?

NASCAR has purely moved on from the “win-you’re-in” philosophy, and now the qualification is strictly point-based. Even if the “10 drivers-10 races” is implemented, NASCAR will still have to answer a critical question. And the question is, what exactly should be the championship reward?

A driver who wins a couple of races but still sits outside the top 10 or 12 will be left out. Who does NASCAR want to prioritize? Season-long consistency, race victories, playoff performance, or regular-season points? Or maybe they want to reward all of them.

The current 16-driver chase may be trying to do all the things mentioned above. Shrinking the field would likely make the cutline more meaningful, but it would also make the financial battle tough.

Ironically, the people who might benefit the most from the smaller field are the broadcasters. Dale Earnhardt Jr. connected the cutline size directly to broadcasting storytelling. When a driver of Larson’s caliber sits on the bubble with three races left, every green flag run, every pit stop, and every restart carries obvious playoff implications.

The broadcast doesn’t need to invent drama. Under the present 16-driver system, the fight for the final spot often involves drivers who’ll not seriously contend for the title once they’re inside the Chase. The bubble conversation is for sure repetitive. A 10-driver field will give broadcasters cleaner and better narratives for the final weeks of the regular season.

What does Chase actually want to accomplish?

Ultimately, the debate is not really about 10 or 16 drivers; it is about the purpose of the chase itself. Is it designed to identify the 10 or 12 clearest championship contenders and force them to prove themselves over 10 races? Or is it designed to give 16 drivers and teams their postseason exposure and opportunities?

Trying to do both at once creates the tension, as Dale Jr. highlighted. A 16-driver field has opportunities and sponsorships, but it softens the cutline and dilutes the sense of being elite and exclusive. Austin Cindric, Bubba Wallace, SVG, and Joey Logano aren’t going to create a big splash even if they make the Chase. But rather if a Chase Elliott or Kyle Larson misses out on title run, that become a much stronger storyline.

NASCAR‘s return to the Chase was an attempt to restore credibility after years of criticism of the elimination format. Keeping 16 drivers was a calculated decision shaped by existing contracts, sponsored deals, and a desire not to disturb the competitive and financial ecosystem. Whether that number can remain indefinitely without removing the very meaning. The change is supposed to provide the answer to the question Dale Earnhardt Jr. keeps forcing into the open. And it’s worth giving thought.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT