Stephen Curry feels like a story you still cannot fully wrap your head around. The greatest Warrior ever. The greatest shooter the game has seen. 4,248 threes and counting. Four rings. Two MVPs, including the only unanimous one. A Finals MVP to top it off. It all sounds unreal, yet it happened. The Baby Faced Assassin has done everything right. And still, when the GOAT debate shows up, his name somehow slips out of the center.

Why is he not in the GOAT conversations of just players, regardless of position? “Yeah, I agree. I definitely agree with that, I think he’s the GOAT,” ex-NBA star Michael Carter-Williams said on Run It Back. “I think he’s changed the game. The reason why, I don’t know, to be honest. I put him up with my all-time greats, I think maybe because he’s had so much help. I don’t know, though, I don’t agree with it, but if I was to answer, like KD went there. But all the greats have had great teams.”

Now, if you truly want to talk about superteams, then the NBA has a history of such teams that were assembled for greatness. Let’s go back in time.

• 1960s Boston Celtics — led by Bill Russell and Bob Cousy.
• 1971-72 Los Angeles Lakers — Wilt Chamberlain, Jerry West, and Elgin Baylor
• 1980s Los Angeles Lakers — Magic Johnson, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, and James Worthy
• 1990s Chicago Bulls — Michael Jordan, Scottie Pippen, and Dennis Rodman
• 1998-99 San Antonio Spurs — Tim Duncan and David Robinson
• 2007-08 Boston Celtics — Kevin Garnett, Paul Pierce, and Ray Allen
• 2011-12 and 2012-13 Miami Heat — LeBron James, Dwyane Wade, and Chris Bosh

Surely, this “Avengers Assemble” type of situation didn’t spawn out of sheer whim. But well curated through contracts, extensions, and championship hopes. And each of these superteams delivered. Some won a single championship together, while others took multiple. For example, Michael Jordan’s Chicago Bulls in the 90s ruled; they took all the 6 titles in their 6 Finals appearance. Double three-peat, just for the record.

LeBron James, Chris Bosh, and D-Wade took two consecutive championships in 2012 and 2013. In fact, Bron left the Cleveland Cavaliers in 2011 with the hunger to win a title, and the Miami Heat were more than happy to build a dream team for the same. Now, coming back to Stephen Curry’s case.

For that small kid from Charlotte, the entire GOAT debate turns into criticism. The loudest pushback around Stephen Curry often circles the team he thrived in. Yes, the Golden State Warriors were loaded. Think Stephen Curry, Klay Thompson, Draymond Green, and then Kevin Durant arriving in 2016. That core turned dangerous into nearly unfair. Imagine a 73-9 season, that broke all records, surpassing the Bulls’ 72-10 record in the 1995-96 season.

So naturally, some fans see the four championships, especially 2017 and 2018, and feel the path looked smoother than a solo superstar grind. It is not about discrediting Curry. Instead, it is about perception. A stacked roster, elite spacing, and a near perfect system make people question how much was brilliance and how much was the environment. Yet the counter hits just as hard.

Before Kevin Durant, this was already Stephen Curry’s creation. He was the spark, the engine, the chaos every defense feared. His gravity bent the game itself. That system worked because of him. So the divide remains. Some lean toward Michael Jordan and LeBron James for individual dominance. Others see Curry’s impact as revolutionary enough to belong right there.

However, if there is one spot in Steph’s career, then it has to be his defense that might be a reason why he is not in the Greatest Of All Time conversation. Because the stars before him, be it LeBron, MJ, or Kobe, all of them were defensive walls.

Stephen Curry’s defense could be the roadblock

Stephen Curry’s defense sits in that awkward middle ground. On paper, it holds up. A career defensive rating around 108.8 to 108.9 is solid for a guard. Even a 115.6 mark in a current season context is far from disastrous. Yet, in GOAT conversations, “solid” rarely moves the needle. The label “defensive liability” shows up more as a playoff tactic than a full truth. Teams hunt him in switches. At 6-foot-2, bigger guards and wings see opportunity. So the narrative sticks, even when the numbers suggest something more balanced.

Then comes the comparison game, and it gets ruthless. Michael Jordan carried 30.1 points, 6.2 rebounds, 5.3 assists, and 2.3 steals per game while locking in defensively. LeBron James sits at a 105.3 defensive rating and still impacts opponent shooting. Magic Johnson, Kobe Bryant, and Tim Duncan brought size or elite defensive instincts.

Meanwhile, Shaquille O’Neal, Wilt Chamberlain, and Bill Russell controlled entire defenses. Against that backdrop, Curry’s defensive presence feels lighter, even if effective within a system. That gap becomes the quiet roadblock. Curry’s offense bends reality. His defense survives it. However, GOAT debates crave dominance on both ends. So while his teams covered gaps and thrived, the perception lingers. Manageable defender, yes. Untouchable two way force, no.

So, this GOAT debate refuses to settle, and maybe that is the point. Stephen Curry built a dynasty, changed the sport, and led greatness before help arrived. Yet perception pushes back. Superteam labels linger, while defensive doubts stay loud. Meanwhile, others set the two way benchmark. So the divide holds firm. Legacy says one thing. The GOAT room still hesitates.