
via Imago
Rick Carlisle, Tyrese Haliburton (Image Credit: IMAGN)

via Imago
Rick Carlisle, Tyrese Haliburton (Image Credit: IMAGN)
For the Indiana Pacers, June ended in heartbreak. The kind of heartbreak that doesn’t even sting- it stuns. Tyrese Haliburton’s collapse just five minutes into Game 7 of the NBA Finals turned the franchise’s dream season into a what-if memory overnight. In that instant, hope was yanked from a team that had finally figured itself out.
Carlisle’s offense, built like jazz- fluid, instinctive, alive- was suddenly missing its lead trumpet. And yet, Indiana didn’t spiral. They adapted. Quietly. Thoughtfully. Maybe even brilliantly.
But for fans wondering how Carlisle was going to steer the Pacers without Haliburton for an entire year, there’s been an odd silence. Until now. No flashy headlines, no splashy trades- just subtle tweaks and a belief that Indiana’s depth will keep the rhythm flowing. The whispers started picking up around mid-July when insiders began noticing lineup shifts and summer-league reps that didn’t quite fit the standard blueprint. Something was brewing. And now we know what it was.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Caitlin Cooper took to X with a revealing post that offered real clarity on Carlisle’s post-Haliburton strategy. After chatting directly with the Pacers coach, she shared a clip that not only shed light on the tactical adjustment but exposed the core of Indiana’s new philosophy. “It’s not just being top-heavy with stars, and roster construction is changing,” Carlisle said in the interview.
“Now it’s become more important to have more good players than be top-heavy with two or three great players that get all the touches, and so things are changing, and everybody is constantly watching what’s going on.” That’s the new Indiana way. It’s not about one savior anymore. It’s about creating a system so balanced, so dynamic, that it can outlast even its brightest star being sidelined.
Hey guys, I talked to Rick Carlisle about the Pacers playing random
– drawing influence from jazz
– implementing this style in 2025 vs 2011
– why the NBA is running less PnR
– do all teams play the same?
– Siakam, always adaptingthis is meaningful https://t.co/682Rtp7oVx pic.twitter.com/JFJ6jcGcGV
— Caitlin Cooper (@C2_Cooper) August 5, 2025
And the proof is in the pivot. With Haliburton likely out all season after Achilles surgery, Carlisle has handed the keys to Andrew Nembhard and T.J. McConnell- two guys who aren’t household names but fit perfectly into Indiana’s jazz-inspired offense. Siakam is stepping deeper into a point-forward role, evolving again. Meanwhile, Quenton Jackson’s re-signing hints at more than just a depth move- he averaged 17 points in his final two games last season. Not a coincidence.
And let’s not forget the rookies. Kam Jones and Taelon Peter, both selected late in the 2025 draft, fit this fast-paced, read-and-react ecosystem like gloves. They’re cost-efficient, low-risk, and built to keep the beat going.
From the outside, it might feel like Carlisle’s banking too hard on continuity. But look closer, and it’s clear this isn’t just a temporary patch job- it’s a shift in how this team thinks. Haliburton isn’t being replaced. He’s being absorbed into the DNA of the system so that when he returns, he’s not saving the day- he’s simply elevating what’s already there. Carlisle’s been through this before.
What’s your perspective on:
Are the Pacers proving that depth and adaptability can outshine star power in the NBA?
Have an interesting take?
He molded Jason Kidd in Dallas. He shaped Luka Dončić’s early years in the league. Now he’s future-proofing the Pacers by making sure the team doesn’t fall apart when one player goes down. That’s not luck. That’s foresight. But as the plan settles into place, something even more unusual caught Carlisle off guard recently- and it had nothing to do with basketball sets or box scores.
A coach and his team, seen differently
While the X’s and O’s dominate pressers and postgame chatter, Carlisle found himself navigating a different kind of feedback loop this summer- one that felt less professional and more personal. In the same conversation with Caitlin Cooper, he opened up about a string of unexpected moments that left him, frankly, a little stunned.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
“I’ve had more people walk up to me randomly that I don’t know, and I don’t get recognized that much out there in the world,” he shared. “And just say, hey, look, you don’t know me, but watching your team this year was inspirational.” No tactics, no analytics. Just appreciation from strangers.

via Imago
Oct 27, 2024; Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Indiana Pacers Head Coach Rick Carlisle talks to forward Aaron Nesmith (23) during the first quarter against the Philadelphia 76ers at Gainbridge Fieldhouse. Mandatory Credit: Marc Lebryk-Imagn Images
What made it odd wasn’t just the public recognition- it was how many people said the same thing. Carlisle admitted it wasn’t a one-off. “Dozens of people,” he noted. That’s not normal for a coach whom people recognize more for his clipboard than for his charisma. It speaks to how Indiana’s style- unpredictable, lively, unselfish, resonated with fans in a way that went beyond wins and losses. Maybe it’s the jazz metaphor. Maybe it’s the underdog energy. Either way, the Pacers played a brand of basketball that made people feel something.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
And when you think about it, that’s the legacy of this past season. Not just the Eastern Conference Finals run, not even Haliburton’s tragic injury. But a moment where basketball stopped being background noise and became something people wanted to talk to a stranger about. Rick Carlisle, the quiet tactician, unintentionally became the face of that movement. Not through a viral quote or memorable meltdown.
Top Stories
Just through basketball that mattered- to the people who watched it and the guy who coached it.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Are the Pacers proving that depth and adaptability can outshine star power in the NBA?