The year 2011 was unique in the league’s history. This was the year that saw the Dallas Mavericks upsetting Miami Heat’s Big Three, keeping LeBron James from winning his first NBA title. This was also the year that denied the Lakers another three-peat under Kobe Bryant’s leadership. Plus, a 161-day lockout did the rest of the bombardment.

In all this, it is easy to forget what happened with the much-hyped Chris Paul trade in the same year. The Lakers were on the brink of signing the maestro playmaker, but a series of events led their fate against it. So what exactly went wrong?

Lakers’ Jeanie Buss cleared the air around the infamous trade

In a recent interview with Matt Barnes, the 59-YO owner of the LA-based franchise revealed all she could about the CP3 trade. The proud president of one of the most successful franchises, detailed, “If you remember, we were in a lockout, right. When there’s a lockout, there’s a moratorium on everything, you can’t make trades, you can’t do anything. As we were making a deal with the union and then starting to lift the lockout. All the representatives of the teams had to be in New York for the board of governors meeting to ratify the new CBA.”

The 2011 lockout was the fourth ever in the league’s history. It happened because of a disagreement between the owners that wanted to impose a hard cap to increase competition and the players that favored the soft salary cap. But how did this possibly stop the Lakers from signing Chris Paul?

Trending

Why Is Gabbie Marshall Not Invited to the 2024 WNBA Draft Despite Graduating From Iowa?

April 13, 2024 06:21 PM EDT

Who’s Raven Johnson’s Family? Meet South Carolina No. 25’s Support System

March 31, 2024 08:27 AM EDT

Gilbert Arenas Exposes Ice Cube’s Big 3’s Financial Problems Amid $5 Million Offer to Caitlin Clark

April 15, 2024 02:51 PM EDT

Larsa Pippen Shows Son Scotty Pippen Jr’s Link With LeBron James’ Camp After His Big Grizzlies Day

April 14, 2024 08:56 PM EDT

Caitlin Clark’s Love Life With Boyfriend Will Blossom if Drafted by Indiana Fever – Here’s Why

April 13, 2024 05:30 PM EDT

Get instantly notified of the hottest NBA stories via Google! Click on Follow Us and Tap the Blue Star.

Follow Us

Just as Jeanie further explained the scenario, “When we’re in this room, all of a sudden there is a rumor that goes around about a trade. At that time the team was run by the league so there’s no way a trade could be happening if we’re all in this room doing league business, except the GM of the team felt that he had the authority to make the trade… Teams felt like how was that possible, we didn’t get a chance to trade for Chris Paul. So they attacked the league and felt this was fair. David Stern didn’t reject the trade as commissioner, he rejected the trade as governor, of the New Orleans team… It wasn’t the NBA keeping the Lakers from trading Chris Paul.”

Read also – ‘Shout Out To My Brother’: Chris Paul Dedicates NBA All-Star Game Win To Kobe Bryant

How did the Chris Paul trade to the Clippers prove bad?

Then NBA Commissioner David Stern vetoing CP3’s trade to the Lakers did not prove right for any team. The league had purchased the team from George Shinn in 2010 and had allowed their GM Dell Demps to continue making the important player decisions. Allegedly, because of some other owners wanting to keep the Lakers from signing Chris, David Stern did not welcome Mr. Dell’s idea of sending the star point guard to them.

Had Chris gone to the Lakers that December, the Rockets would have gotten Pau Gasol and Lamar Odom, and the Hornets would’ve received Goran Dragic, Kevin Martin, Luis Scola, and NY’s 2012 1st round pick.

However, what actually happened was a CP3 trade to the Clippers with the Hornets acquiring Eric Gordon, Chris Kaman, Al-Farouq Aminu, and Wolves’ 2012 1st round pick. This difference in the trades changed the course for each of the teams involved or even not involved. The formation of a Kobe Bryant and Chris Paul duo never happened, and we still have CP3 without a ring. Plus, it did not even help neither the Clippers nor Hornets to that extent as imagined. What do you think? Was it a flawed decision? Help us know in the comments.