Home/NBA
feature-image
feature-image

Mitch Richmond didn’t hold back when reflecting on the iconic Showtime Lakers, peeling back the curtain on what made that era so legendary. Everyone knows about Shaquille O’Neal’s dominance and Kobe Bryant’s relentless drive—but Mitch’s behind-the-scenes insights add a whole new flavor. He painted a picture of calculated chaos, where swagger met structure, and where personalities as big as their stat lines clashed and clicked.  His recollections don’t just preserve history—they rewrite it, with stories only a real one from that era could tell.

The Lakers dominated the early 2000s with Kobe and Shaq leading the charge—three straight championships, relentless playoff runs, and unmatched star power. They blended brute force with finesse, turning Staples Center into a fortress. Off the court? Just as electric. Showtime never really ended—it simply evolved with them. But that’s just the tip of the iceberg. No one either talents – just wondered if there’s more to the successthan what meets the eye. And guess what – you pretty much nailed that suspicion.

“Like you said, in his first couple of years, [Kobe] had some down moments. And he was determined to get better,” said Mitch on Byron Scott’s Fast Break. He was always fighting to become that guy. And with that dynamic between him and Shaq, there was definitely a bit of a battle. Shaq knew he was the best player—he was the most dominant—and he also knew Kobe wanted to be great.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

article-image

via Imago

You must be thinking – clash of egos, pretty natural right? And you’re right – but there’s a lot more to it. The locker room wasn’t pretty at all. “He was always cussing Phil out—all the time. That was just a thing between them.” Kobe’s ego really got the better of him at times – who knew.

That Lakers team really built a dynasty that left everyone else shook. Mitch Richmond knew it firsthand—before he joined them, he had to play against them. And trust him, nobody looked forward to that assignment. Facing Shaquille O’Neal meant absorbing a freight train; dealing with Kobe Bryant meant chasing shadows. Richmond admitted it felt like stepping into a storm—every possession a war, every shot contested, every mistake punished. He admired the machine they’d built. And once he became part of it? He finally saw how greatness worked from the inside.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Mitch Richmond on Shaquille O’Neal Lakers: “Man, we couldn’t f–k with the Lakers”

The Shaq and Kobe era brought Showtime back with a vengeance—just louder, meaner, and with way more swagger. Shaq bulldozed through defenders like a wrecking ball in Nikes, while Kobe sliced them up like poetry in motion. Together, they led the Lakers to three straight championships from 2000 to 2002, steamrolling anyone in their path. Phil Jackson gave them the triangle, but they gave it attitude. Staples Center turned into a warzone for visiting teams, and the drama off the court only made the wins more iconic. It wasn’t pretty behind the scenes, but on the scoreboard? Utter domination.

“Man, we couldn’t f–k with the Lakers… We had nobody for Shaq. Nobody,” said Mitch on the pod“But against the Lakers? No shot. And we had a really good team too [as the Kings]. But we had no chance against L.A., because like you said—they were locked in. They were focused on winning that third straight title.” That Mamba mentality ran deep – Kobe or not.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

What’s your perspective on:

Was the Shaq-Kobe era the last true dynasty in the NBA, or just the most entertaining?

Have an interesting take?

article-image

via Getty

The current LakeShow ought to see those videos back again. God forbid they need another Showtime era before LeBron hangs up the sneakers. But if you’re asking Mitch Richmond, they’re probably better off without such dominance. You know, for the ratings and all.

ADVERTISEMENT

0
  Debate

"Was the Shaq-Kobe era the last true dynasty in the NBA, or just the most entertaining?"

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT