feature-image

Imago

feature-image

Imago

ESPN’s recent wave of layoffs continues to fuel debate about how the network treats its biggest personalities. This time, The Athletic’s Andrew Marchand raised a compelling argument that the network seemingly handles its marquee stars differently from the rest of its talent roster. He offered a blunt assessment of the network’s current hierarchy. 

Watch What’s Trending Now!

“There’s rules for Stephen A., there’s rules for Pat McAfee, and then there’s a different set of rules for everyone else,” Marchand said on his podcast. “And I think there are. I mean, Ryan Clark learned that, I think, in this situation to some degree.” 

ADVERTISEMENT

During his commentary, Marchand specifically called Ryan Clark, Cam Newton, Tom Pelissero, Karl Ravech, and others the “real victims” of ESPN’s layoffs. On the other hand, he branded Smith and McAfee as the “fake victims.” His characterization seems to be based on the notion that the network’s top-tier stars enjoy significant contractual protection and internal influence, unlike Clark and others. 

NFL biographer Jeff Pearlman had a similar opinion. Taking to TikTok, Pearlman shared a rant slamming McAfee for indulging in gambling talk on the Pat McAfee Show. McAfee claimed that he got insider information about LeBron James’ free agency destination from Shams Charania and reportedly placed a wager. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“ESPN just laid off a bunch of people, real reporters, real journalists, people who take this seriously,” Pearlman said. “And we’re listening to Shams, who’s their NBA insider, on the show with the guy talking about how he used information that he received on his show from people involved with his show to gamble on where LeBron James is going.”

However, Marchand’s reasoning seems to center around leverage and security. His comparison perfectly highlights the reality of ESPN’s current, star-driven strategy. As Jemele Hill recently highlighted, ESPN has started building around the massive draws of McAfee and Smith. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Hill claimed that ESPN and other media houses used to invest in developing their in-house shows. But that’s no longer the case. Because The Pat McAfee Show already functioned as a highly successful, plug-and-play unit with a massive digital following, ESPN licensed the show while allowing McAfee to retain total creative control over his own production. 

The ESPN layoffs happened after Disney acquired NFL Network. The deal gave them a 10% equity stake in ESPN. But Jimmy Pitaro, ESPN’s chairman, told Front Office Sports that the decision around the layoffs was based on a careful evaluation of the company’s collective teams, resources, and organizational structure. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Whether one agrees with Marchand’s assessment or not, his comments have added another layer to the ongoing conversation surrounding ESPN’s business model. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Share this with a friend:

Link Copied!

ADVERTISEMENT

Written by

author-image

Krushna Prasad Pattnaik

3,361 Articles

Krushna Pattnaik is an NFL Writer at EssentiallySports, covering the league across news, roster moves, and team developments. With a medical background, he brings particular depth to stories around player injuries, medical suspensions, and health-related developments. As a Senior Writer, he honed his editorial skills through the EssentiallySports Journalistic Excellence Program. Before moving to the NFL beat, Krushna spent three years at EssentiallySports covering MMA and Olympic sports, working across prediction pieces, live event assignments, and beat reports. With five years of personal training in Jiu-Jitsu, kickboxing, and taekwondo, he brought a practitioner's perspective to his fight coverage. He also briefly contributed to the ES YouTube team. His work earned external recognition, including a nod from Conor McGregor, and one of his pieces was featured on Brendan Schaub's podcast.

Know more

Edited by

editor-image

Rohini Kottu

ADVERTISEMENT