
Imago
Oct 23, 2024; Inglewood, California, USA; Stephen A. Smith (Stephen Smith) on the ESPN NBA Countdown live set at Intuit Dome. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-Imagn Images

Imago
Oct 23, 2024; Inglewood, California, USA; Stephen A. Smith (Stephen Smith) on the ESPN NBA Countdown live set at Intuit Dome. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-Imagn Images
Essentials Inside The Story
- Stephen A. Smith has finally addressed the mounting speculation regarding a potential move from the sports desk to the Oval Office.
- During a street interview, the ESPN commentator laid out the ultimate non-negotiable factor that is dictating his political future.
- After months of rumors, the 58-year-old broadcaster established a firm timeline for when his definitive decision will be out.
When billionaires start calling, you listen. When elected officials start recruiting, you consider. But when your bank account starts talking? That’s game over, and Stephen A. Smith appears to have made his decision. The ESPN personality who’s spent months teasing a 2028 presidential run just drew a line in the sand, and it’s written in dollar signs.
Watch What’s Trending Now!
“I’m not saying ‘I’m going to do it’ because make no mistake, according to the rules, my understanding is I would have to give up my money,” Stephen A. Smith said in a revealing TMZ Sports interview in the streets of NOLA last week. “I’d have to leave my job because I’m not supposed to have that access to the airwaves.
“I can assure you, I don’t give a damn how much I want to do something, I’m not giving up my money to do that. If there was a way that I could keep my money and still run, I would be much more forceful about it.
“(But) I promised them I would make a definitive decision about it until 2027, so that’s it.”
It’s not a secret that the sports broadcaster, who made a big name calling out players like the NBA’s LeBron James and more, has been vying for an opportunity in the political field. His reasoning is simple: He doesn’t like what’s happening with the country. And while there are leaders at the helm, they are not the kind of leaders that America needs. His solution? Enter himself in the run.
But he has more often than not been playing mind tricks so far:
- In a recent CBS News Sunday Morning interview with Robert Costa, Smith said he was giving “strong consideration” to a 2028 run.
- He also appeared in some 2028 candidate polls, including one by the McLaughlin & Associates poll, winning two percent of the votes for the Democratic Party.
- Earlier in February, he mentioned that he would rather trade jabs with other sports personalities than run for the office.
- But then again, on The View, he challenged the Democrats, saying he would beat them all.
- In June last year, he was against running in 2027.
- During his ABC’s This Week appearance, Stephen A. Smith revealed he had “no choice” but to consider a presidential run.
Every other month, Smith seemingly changes his decision. However, now, he has one final verdict to give by 2027.
This year, he will do what feels familiar to how the current President came into the position: He will use 2026 to study the issues in focus and whatnots of being the President of the USA and think about his decision. And here’s what’s interesting: current POTUS Donald Trump himself rooted for Stephen A. to make the run in May 2025.
The endorsement aged like milk, to say the least.
However, Smith is a democrat. He doesn’t like where the party is currently, but if he does run in 2028, it would be against Trump’s Republican Party. So, even though he got support from the POTUS and doesn’t exactly like where the Democratic Party is at present, he would rather challenge him than stand alongside him. But for him, this wasn’t about political ambition in the traditional sense.
View this post on Instagram
When asked what was driving his consideration, Stephen A. Smith delivered the most explosive soundbite of the interview, taking direct aim at current officials.
“Well, the country sucks, and I don’t think that the country is devoid of leadership,” Smith bluntly stated. “The kind of leadership that we have, we don’t need. The kind of leadership we should be getting, nobody is stepping up and doing it.”
That frustration is the exact catalyst for his political teasing.
Ultimately, Stephen A. Smith explained that his real desire isn’t to sit in the Oval Office. Instead, he simply wants the chance to hold officials accountable, much like his fiery takes on the NFL.
“I don’t desire to be a politician,” Smith explained. “But in the same breath, the opportunity to go on a debate stage and call out these politicians for the things that they’ve done to damage this country is something that appeals to me very much.”
Smith’s frustration reflects a broader cultural moment where sports personalities increasingly head toward political commentary. Smith has previously appeared on ABC’s This Week and other political programs, building credibility beyond his First Take desk.
But here’s where Smith’s practical side overtakes his political ambitions. Meanwhile, the Federal Communications Commission’s Equal Time Rule would force ESPN to offer all of Smith’s opponents equal airtime.
That would effectively end Smith’s broadcasting career, and this becomes a deal-breaker.
His five-year, $100 million ESPN deal represents generational wealth. For Smith, walking away would require financial security so that losing his money and career wouldn’t matter.
Stephen A. Smith still leaves a route open to politics
Despite his take on losing his fortune and career, Smith hasn’t slammed the door completely yet. In the TMZ Sports interview, he noted that he had promised stakeholders that he wouldn’t make anything final before 2027.
“They keep telling me, ‘Listen, keep your name out there. We really want you to do it,” Smith explained. “And I promised them that I wouldn’t make a definitive decision about it until 2027. So that’s it. I’ll listen. But right now, I can’t imagine that I’m going to do it. But I haven’t completely closed the door.”
For Stephen A. Smith to finally make a decision, though, the calculus is quite simple: Unless his wealth reaches levels where losing the ESPN payment becomes irrelevant, politics remains in the backseat.
“My money has to be tight,” Smith notes. “I don’t need to worry about my quality of life ever again. That’s the only way that I would definitively say, ‘I would do it’. I’m not going to jeopardize my quality of life on a ‘maybe you might win.’”
Instead, Stephen A. Smith maintains his desire to debate against the politicians instead of running for the president’s office himself. If victory was guaranteed, however, he could change his mind.
“But I’m not going to lie and act like it wouldn’t be attracted if I knew I could win the presidency, that I wouldn’t be tempted because I know I would,” concluded Smith.
Written by
Edited by

Shrabana Sengupta