Russell Wilson’s arrival at the Denver Broncos has been a blockbuster deal for the massive amount the franchise decided to spend on the player. Nonetheless, it has attracted much criticism from analyst Shannon Sharpe, who thinks he could’ve gotten a better deal elsewhere.

According to Sharpe’s breakdown, Wilson saved more money than his actual worth with the Broncos, leaving them in a complicated situation. However, the deal was not as simple as many perks were included for the Broncos, including the first-round picks.

Shannon Sharpe’s analysis of the sumptuous salary of Russell Wilson

While other top quarterbacks like Aaron Rodgers ($40.32 million) and Ryan ($40.53 million) have a combined salary less than Russell Wilson’s, it casts a heavy question on the Denver Broncos’ spending strategy. However, as we dive deeper into the deal’s details, we understand that the Seahawks received a treasure trove of assets in exchange for Wilson. He went as far as calling the deal an “Epic fail.” Moreover, his two-year tenure with the Broncos saw him rake a staggering $124 million just in salaries.

Their perks were massive, from the first two-round picks to two second-round picks and a fifth-round pick over multiple drafts. They also relinquished players like tight-end Noah Fant, quarterback Drew Lock, and defensive tackle Shelby Harris. Similarly, their decision to offload Wilson had many reasons, including needing more time to offer the contracts he demanded during extension negotiations. Not only did the Seahawks pull off a masterstroke, but they also turned an unwanted asset into a bed of blessings with draft picks and promising players.

Sharpe’s criticism of the Broncos’ management

Apart from appreciating the Broncos’ management, he was also critical of their perceived misstep by putting a hefty price tag on them and their depletion of valuable assets, leaving them worse after him. Sharpe explained his analysis by saying, “You got a coat that you no longer want to wear, and you know what somebody says? Oh man, I give you $50,000 for that coat. You’re like, okay, hell, I was looking to get rid of it anyway. Right, that’s what the Seattle Seahawks did for Russell.” While initial excitement from the fans grazed his acquisition, the future did not prove to be very kind to them.

Top Stories

Tom Brady Makes Career Announcement for Vegas as Pete Carroll Addresses Losing Raiders Locker Room

Cam Newton Makes NFL Return Conditions Clear to 32 Teams as Panthers Legend Confirms Retirement Stance

J. J. McCarthy Awaits Punishment From Vikings After Rejecting Kevin O’Connell’s Instructions

“RIP”: Tragedy Strikes ESPN Reporter Jenna Laine as Prayers Pour In From NFL Fans

Is Philip Rivers Catholic or Mormon? Religion, Ethnicity & More About Colts QB

Read More:  “Raiders Way Wouldn’t Work”: Shannon Sharpe Endorses Antonio Pierce’s Methods After Michael Lombardi’s Controversial Jab

In a league where success is based on very calculated risk-taking and astute decision-making, the fallout from the Wilson trade underlines the fine line between glory and failure in pro football. What do you think could the Broncos have done better? Let us know in the comments below.

Read Also: “This Ain’t 2000”: Shannon Sharpe Joins NFLPA in Blasting Chiefs’ Outdated Facilities as Clark Hunt Gets F- From Players