John Calipari recently offered a glimpse into a new reality, revealing that 9 of his Arkansas players make more than his assistant coaches, while 3 earn more than his entire staff. And now, former wide receiver DeSean Jackson has stepped into the debate, pointing to a question that could shape the future of college sports.
Watch What’s Trending Now!
Speaking on Up & Adams Show with Kay Adams, DeSean noted,
“I want to say they’re making too much money, but I feel like it should be a cap because, say, I’m LSU, and I’m paying over 90 million, 80 million for NIL, and then I am Kentucky, and I can only afford 15 million. Who has the better advantage? You know what I’m saying? So I just feel like it’s almost the teams that can pay at that level that are going to continuously get the best talent, and they’re going to be the better teams.
“It’s, and you know, for smaller schools that don’t have the budgets and don’t have that money to pay, it’s like we’re almost at a disadvantage. But I’m for the players getting that money. You know, obviously, I wasn’t getting that money, but if we could go back or if I was able to get paid during this era, I already know what I would have been seeing. Boy, it would have been good.”
DeSean Jackson argued that the current system tilts the field toward the richest programs. He made clear that he was not fully comfortable with college football players being paid at all, which makes his support for limits more about competitive balance than opposition to athletes earning money.
Jackson supports Calipari’s push for changes to the NIL structure. His comments come amid an increasingly expensive NIL landscape. LSU’s 2026 football roster has been estimated at roughly $42.7 million, although such figures are market estimates rather than an official school payroll.
Calipari has been open about the Protect College Sports Act. The bipartisan bill, introduced by Sens. Ted Cruz and Maria Cantwell, focuses on creating a regulated system for compensation, transfer limits, and player eligibility.
The Tigers, under head coach Lane Kiffin, have leaned into the transfer portal, bringing in major additions such as QB Sam Leavitt and offensive tackle Jordan Seaton. Reports have placed LSU among the most aggressive programs in college football when it comes to roster spending.
But Jackson’s concern is not limited to LSU. He believes the difference in financial resources could determine which programs consistently acquire top talent.
LSU itself is dealing with the financial consequences of the new college athletics model. According to the Louisiana Illuminator, LSU Athletics projects a $26 million deficit for the current year after recording a $44 million shortfall last year.
The school spent the maximum amount allowed under the new direct athlete-compensation system, with $21.5 million accounting for a big portion of the deficit.
His comments are another voice in this complicated conversation about NIL. As college athletics adjusts to direct athlete compensation and massive rosters, the question is how much and how long the system can handle the financial difference.