Tennis fans are furious after ESPN’s coverage hiccup left a few Australian Open matches off-air, sparking backlash over pricing access and what many call a blatant disservice to the sport. American tennis supporters have had plenty to celebrate at this year’s AO, with U.S. stars flooding the QF at Melbourne Park. Coco Gauff, Ben Shelton, Jessica Pegula, Amanda Anisimova, and rising stars like Learner Tien and Iva Jovic have kept national interest sky-high. But instead of enjoying wall-to-wall coverage, many fans found themselves staring at…

Virtual golf! Social media erupted after viewers noticed ESPN2 airing alternative programming instead of live Australian Open action, including the highly anticipated Aryna Sabalenka vs Iva Jovic clash. Frustrated fans questioned why premium tennis content was sidelined, with some even calling on the AO’s official channels for help.

The outrage has been compounded by ESPN’s recent pricing overhaul. Under the new system, ESPN+ subscribers – who previously paid $12.99 per month- now receive only limited coverage. Full access to every AO requires an upgrade to ESPN Unlimited, priced at $29.99 per month.

With temperatures soaring in Melbourne and blockbuster matches such as this one: Aryna Sabalenka vs Iva Jovic drawing global attention, fans believe the broadcast focus should remain firmly on the tennis, not subscription tiers. Here’s what they had to say:

Tennis fans aren’t too pleased with ESPN’s coverage hiccup during Aryna Sabalenka’s QF match at the Australian Open

With temperatures soaring as high as 100 degrees Fahrenheit in Melbourne, the current world number one, Aryna Sabalenka, ended the 18-year-old American Iva Jovic’s Australian Open dream by defeating her by a 6-3, 6-0 margin in just under 90 minutes in their QF match. With this win, Sabalenka has now become just the third player to reach 8+ consecutive women’s singles SF at Grand Slams on hard court. But more than her incredible performance, ESPN’s recent fiasco has now become the talk of the town in the tennis world.

One of the fans expressed frustration by saying, “Last year I could have seen it on @espn plus. but it’s not ESPN plus anymore. It’s ESPN minus. It’s like they don’t want me to see any tennis at all.”

While ESPN Unlimited is bundled with select providers like DirecTV, Hulu + Live TV, FuboTV, Verizon FiOS, Cox, and U-verse, standalone streaming subscribers feel left behind. Many argue the shift unfairly forces loyal tennis fans to pay more for content that was once readily available. Another one went a step ahead and labeled it, “ESPN is greedy! What a scam 😤.”

Top Stories

Iga Swiatek Denied Entry at Australian Open For the Same Reason as Roger Federer

Who Is Learner Tien’s Coach? Michael Chang’s Net Worth, Wife, Parents, & Contract

Who are Learner Tien’s Parents, Khuong and Huyen? Everything to Know About the American Star’s Family Background

Amanda Anisimova Breaks Silence After Controversial Exchange Sparks Backlash: “It’s Tough”

Jannik Sinner Speaks Out After Breaking Same Rule As Carlos Alcaraz at Australian Open

As the 2026 Australian Open heads into its decisive stages, the backlash serves as a reminder: in a sport fighting for mainstream traction, access matters, and fans are watching more than just the matches. Some of them claimed, “It’s absolutely ridiculous & I’m sitting here watching it waiting for tennis, checking the score on my phone.”

But this isn’t the first time that ESPN has landed in controversy while telecasting tennis matches. For example, during the 2024 US Open, tennis legend Paul McNamee claimed that Aryna Sabalenka was subjected to “unnecessary” and “insensitive” footage by ESPN. The footage in question was taken after Sabalenka’s defeat at the 2023 US Open final against Coco Gauff, where she was seen venting her frustration on her racket in the gym. Even this time, seeing this blunder by ESPN, several fans also raised their eyebrows.

Now, reacting to their recent hiccup during Aryna Sabalenka’s QF match at the 2026 Australian Open, others wrote, “Yeah I’m not signing up for another f-cking poorly bundled subscription. @espn. May just get rid of plus since that’s was for tennis.”

Just before the start of the Australian Open, fans were seen expressing their frustration on social media after ESPN announced that they have parted ways with two longtime tennis experts, Pam Shriver and Brad Gilbert, ahead of the tournament. Now, this incident in the QF match makes the fans even more annoyed. A few of them tweeted, “Freaking ridiculous.”

As tennis continues to battle for a stronger foothold in mainstream sports culture, moments like this alienate its most passionate supporters. When fans are willing to stay up through the night to watch the Australian Open, the least broadcasters can do is ensure the matches are actually on their screens without forcing them into yet another paywall. Share your thoughts on this controversy.