feature-image
feature-image

A win or loss in combat sports is quite significant. Even if the fight is not for a title or has any significant consequences or corollaries. This is because every time a fighter enters the squared circle, it is “their Superbowl” to quote former UFC welterweight champion Tyron Woodley.

Watch What’s Trending Now!

This is why judging and refereeing is so important to all combat sports. It is not uncommon to see a fighter lose in the eyes of the fans, analysts, and even commentators, but win on the scorecard. Paddy Pimblett‘s victory over Jared Gordon last December is a case in point. And the same goes for refereeing. UFC fans will be aware of the recent controversy over Aljamain Sterling vs. Sean O’Malley allegedly being stopped early that cropped up after their recent title bout. It is in this context that the California State Athletic Commission’s (CSAC) recent steps to promote transparency in judging and refereeing are being appreciated by the MMA world.

ADVERTISEMENT

CSAC takes steps to promote transparency in judging and refereeing

Athletic Commissions are responsible for hiring the referees and judges for any fights held in their jurisdiction. The California State Athletic Commission recently created history by allowing the news outlet MMA Junkie to be present at the post-fight event debriefing following Bellator 290. There their correspondent was allowed to ask the judges and referees questions regarding their decisions.

article-image

Imago

This, however, is in stark contrast to the Nevada State Athletic Commission (NSAC), the most significant commission in the country as more fights are held in that state than any other. The NSAC frowns upon any public statements by judges and referees on their decision, which some have argued hurts the credibility of the officials and the sport.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dana White fumes at judge for Shevchenko-Grasso decision

Alexa Grasso retained her UFC featherweight title at UFC Noche last month after a draw against Valentina Shevchenko. This was possible because Judge Mike Bell scored the last round 10-8 in favor of Grasso. This outraged Dana White, who blasted the judge after the fight and asked he be investigated.

Read More: Who Is MMA Judge Mike Bell? What Was the Controversial Decision He Made at UFC Noche: Valentina Shevchenko vs. Alexa Grasso?

“When I found out that one of the judges scored 10-8, I’m like, this guy should be f****** investigated for this. This is the craziest s*** I’ve ever seen in my life,” White said on the decision. “You have to have the best of the best in title fights. So they’ve assured me that this guy isn’t a bad guy, he just f***** up and made a mistake, and it’s unfortunate, and there’s no way in hell that was a 10-8 round,” he added.

What do you think about CSAC’s decision? Let us know in the comments section below.

Watch This Story: Who Is Sean Strickland’s Girlfriend? 

Share this with a friend:

Link Copied!

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Written by

author-image

Kanishk Thakur

2,731 Articles

Kanishk Thakur is a senior UFC writer at EssentiallySports with over 2500 articles. A seasoned writer with about 5 years of professional writing experience, he has expertly covered the heated rivalries in the fight game and delivered meticulous reports of athlete payouts here at ES. Additionally, he also unravels stories that occur outside the cage, in fighters' lives. Conor McGregor even shouted out Kanishk's spread on Forged Irish stout on his socials. When he's not drafting his next piece for his readers, you can find him hunched over a book.

Know more

Edited by

editor-image

Arijit Saha

ADVERTISEMENT