Michael Bisping has been synonymous with the UFC for nearly two decades, transitioning from one of the most tenacious fighters in the promotion’s history to a respected voice behind the mic. In 2019, Bisping officially joined the UFC commentary team, a move that showcased his sharp fight IQ and charismatic personality. The author of the bestselling memoir Quitters Never Win embodies the title of his book, continually pushing boundaries even after his fighting career concluded.

Known for his candid takes and deep understanding of the sport, Bisping is a regular presence on the commentary panel during UFC events held outside the United States. But does the former 185lbs kingpin aspire to take on a full-time role on the commentary team? The former champion’s approach to this question reflects his no-nonsense attitude. While he enjoys calling international events and providing fans with insight, he’s always been about quality over quantity in his second career. So let’s see in detail what Bisping had to say!

Michael Bisping opens up about the prospect of a permanent spot on UFC’s commentary squad

In a recent YouTube video on his channel of the same name, Michael Bisping shared his Christmas Day breakdown of UFC 2025 while reading out fans’ wish lists for the new year. One intriguing fan request stood out—a permanent spot for Bisping on the UFC commentary panel. While flattered, the former middleweight champion made it clear that he isn’t looking for a daily role as a commentator, though he’s happy to step in when needed.

Addressing the suggestion, ‘The Count’ said, “Well, for one, I already have that. But I know what you’re saying—a regular spot on the pay-per-view cards will be awesome. But I don’t want to take somebody’s job. That gig is held down by Joe Rogan—the Godfather, the creator, the inventor of MMA commentary, let’s be honest. Jon Anik is number one; a lot of people call him the GOAT. And of course, Daniel Cormier. That’s set in stone. Joe Rogan doesn’t travel out of the country, and when one of those guys is unavailable, we get a little upgrade.”

Bisping expressed satisfaction with his current role, stepping in for international UFC events like in London, Manchester, and Abu Dhabi or filling in when Rogan isn’t available. It’s no secret that Joe Rogan limits his commentary work to events within the United States due to his packed schedule and commitments that make extensive travel challenging.

Even without a permanent spot on major UFC pay-per-view cards, Bisping has become a staple of foreign UFC broadcasts. His sharp analysis, quick wit, and partnership with former fighters like Paul Felder have made him a fan favorite. Recently, Michael Bisping shared his thoughts on a significant development in combat sports: the potential integration of artificial intelligence into judging and rankings. Fans are well aware of the ongoing controversies surrounding fighter rankings and questionable judging decisions in both MMA and boxing.

To address these issues, UFC CEO Dana White has floated the idea of using AI technology to improve the accuracy of rankings. Additionally, the concept of a fourth, AI-driven judge to complement human judges during fights has gained traction. So, how does Bisping feel about the prospect of AI influencing combat sports?

Bisping comments on the inclusion of AI in combat sports

‘The Count’ recently shared his thoughts on the groundbreaking inclusion of artificial intelligence in the scoring process during the highly anticipated Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk rematch. Speaking during a YouTube livestream, Michael Bisping discussed the buzz surrounding the use of an AI judge and its potential impact on combat sports.

“So apparently, for Fury vs. Usyk, they’re using an AI judge. I thought they were only going to use an AI judge, but they are having actual judges, of course,” Bisping explained. He elaborated on the innovation, calling it an intriguing experiment. “They’re gonna use an AI judge as an experiment, so I like it. Innovative.”

Bisping also touched on the controversial history of scoring in both boxing and MMA, a topic that continues to frustrate fans and fighters alike. He expressed optimism about AI’s potential to remove biases from judging, stating, “There’s been some crazy, crazy judging in boxing. At least they [AI] won’t be biased.”

The controversies he referred to include Tai Tuivasa’s puzzling 30-27 scorecard in his UFC 305 loss to Jairzinho Rozenstruik and Tyson Fury’s claim that he won his first fight against Usyk “by at least three rounds.” In the Fury vs. Usyk 2 fight, the AI judge scored the bout 118-112 in favor of Usyk. Fury, unimpressed by the AI’s verdict, responded sharply, “F— all computers—more jobs for humans.”

The inclusion of AI in combat sports is undoubtedly a step toward modernization, but it also sparks debate about its broader implications. Could this lead to an era of AI-integrated judging and even AI-driven commentary in the future? Let us know what you think about Micheal Bisping’s future in the realm of commentary!