

UFC Vegas 51 co-main event bout had a weird finish. Not only the finishing sequence but also the result of the bout shocked the MMA space. The co-main recreated an Aljamain Sterling-Petr Yan moment.
Watch What’s Trending Now!
The ending of the bout between Caio Borralho and Gadzhi Omargadzhiev saw the infamous Petr Yan-knee moment from the initial Yan-Sterling bout at UFC 259. At UFC 259, then-champion Petr Yan got disqualified and ‘Funk Master’ became the UFC bantamweight champion via disqualification due to an illegal knee from Yan.
ADVERTISEMENT
In the penultimate bout of The UFC on ESPN 34, Caio Borralho won a controversial technical decision against the Russian fighter Gadzhi Omargadzhiev. This came after Borralho landed an illegal knee to the head of Omargadzhiev.
ADVERTISEMENT
Read More: Vicente Luque’s UFC Losses: Who Has Defeated Vicente Luque Inside the Octagon?
Omargadzhiev’s one hand was grounded, thus, the strike was deemed illegal. However, the ref decided to rule the knee ‘accidental’ and not ‘intentional’ as was the case with former bantamweight champion Petr Yan‘s knee to Aljamain Sterling.
ADVERTISEMENT
Thus, it blew away the MMA space.
I hope y’all give him the SAME treatment y’all gave me. Because apparently those knees don’t hurt 🤣🤦🏾♂️ Keep that same energy, folks!#UFCVegas51
— Aljamain Sterling (@funkmasterMMA) April 17, 2022
The Russian is pulling a funk master 🤣🤣🤣
— 🍀SkinnyMcGregor🍀 (@jepeters187) April 17, 2022
ADVERTISEMENT
Hahaha no cap the Russian is acting wallah
— 100 (@Menacee0) April 17, 2022
Why are the Russians quiet all of a sudden? 😂
— Goshinby (@Goshinby) April 17, 2022
ADVERTISEMENT
Why was the UFC Vegas 51 fight ended in a ‘technical decision’ and not a ‘no-contest’?
The outcome of the bout saw Borralho win the technical decision. In other words, the judges scored the bout till the time the ref stopped the fight and scored it for Borralho. Though, in the bout, the ref had to intervene; he felt the illegal strike from Borralho was not intentional. Thus, he didn’t disqualify Borralho.
As there were no disqualifications, they could have ruled the bout out as a no-contest as fight fans saw one such example in the fight between Leon Edwards and Belal Muhammad, where an accidental strike from Edwards stopped the fight.
Top Stories
Alex Pereira’s Two-Word Response to Tracy Cortez’s Mid-Air Proposal Goes Viral

Two-Time Venezuelan UFC Champion Clears Stance on Trump’s Takeover and Maduro’s Capture

Tom Aspinall Boosts His Own “Nightmare” by Backing Alex Pereira’s UFC Heavyweight Debut

Who Is Arman Tsarukyan’s Father? Nairi Tsarukyan’s Net Worth, Profession & Businesses

Paddy Pimblett Supports Legalizing Risky MMA Move That Led to Petr Yan’s UFC Title Loss

ADVERTISEMENT
The referee ruled it a no-contest, and the fight didn’t go to the judge’s scorecards. The reason being, the fight, Edwards vs. Muhammad, didn’t complete the midway point. Otherwise, that would’ve gone to the judge’s scorecards as well.
ADVERTISEMENT
Hence, in case of an accidental strike, the duration of the bout determines whether it will be ruled a ‘no-contest’ or a ‘technical decision’.
WATCH THIS STORY – Five Things You Didn’t Know About Cowboy Alex Oliveira
What do you make of UFC on ESPN 34 co-main event? Let us know in the comments.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

