Russian Kamila Valieva Banned, but Chinese Swimmers Spared Despite Same Substance Consumption During Tokyo Olympics
Follow Us
The pall of gloom that doping has cast on sports since a millennium is one of great peril. Earlier this year, Russian figure skater Kamila Valieva grabbed headlines but not for a good reason. The 17-year-old prodigy found herself embroiled in a doping controversy, casting a shadow over her promising career.
Valieva faced the consequences of an anti-doping rule violation stemming from a positive test prior to the 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing. As a result, she received a substantial four-year ban from the sport. Her test revealed the presence of the banned substance trimetazidine.
The case of Kamila Valieva vs. Chinese Swimmers – why the disparity in doping rulings?
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
In a parallel story, the news of 23 Chinese swimmers being permitted to participate in the Tokyo Olympics despite testing positive for the same banned substance, which is trimetazidine. This substance helps with heart issues by boosting blood circulation and keeping blood pressure steady. The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) banned it since 2014 categorizing it as a “hormone and metabolic modulator.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Trending
Patrick Mahomes & Brittany Unexpectedly Silent as Mahomes Family Swarmed With Wishes on Brother Jackson’s Birthday
May 16, 2024 02:07 PM EDT
Countdown Starts for Charles Barkley and TNT Crew as Ernie Johnson Makes Heartfelt Confession Before Parting
May 16, 2024 06:00 AM EDT
Joe Rogan Wants to Make MMA Difficult After Dana White Told to Remove Cage From UFC Fights – “Better if It Was Like a Basketball Court”
May 16, 2024 05:03 PM EDT
Dale Earnhardt Jr’s Stepmother Follows Through on the Grudge, With His Legacy Also Hanging in the Balance
May 16, 2024 04:49 AM EDT
$35 Million Worth Drew Bledsoe Breaks Silence on How Much Netflix Paid Him for Tom Brady Roast
May 16, 2024 07:46 AM EDT
Get instantly notified of the hottest Swimming stories via Google! Click on Follow Us and Tap the Blue Star.
Follow Us
Athletes are not allowed to use it during or outside of competitions because it is thought to improve performance possibly creating an edge. But what if there was a reason for Kamila Valieva to take it? Kamila Valieva attributed her positive doping test to a strawberry dessert allegedly contaminated by her grandfather’s use of a chopping board previously used to crush his medication pills, including TMZ, a drug for preventing angina.
However, the Court of Arbitration for Sport dismissed this explanation, stating it lacked concrete evidence and failed to establish her innocence. Despite Valieva’s age, CAS concluded that she could not prove she didn’t intentionally commit the anti-doping rule violation, thus denying any leniency typically granted to athletes under the “no significant fault or negligence” criterion. But why were Chinese swimmers allowed still allowed?
Were Chinese swimmers’ positive tests validated or masked?
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
It has come to light that twenty-three Chinese swimmers had tested positive for TMZ, months before the 2020 Tokyo Olympics. Surprisingly they were allowed to participate despite this. How did this happen? The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) accepted the explanation given by officials stating that the positive tests were due to contaminated food ingested by the swimmers at their hotel.
The joint investigative report revealed that the Chinese anti-doping agency, CHINADA, had submitted a 61-page dossier to WADA in 2021, citing traces of TMZ found in various parts of the hotel kitchen in Shijiazhuang where the swimmers had lodged. Despite assertions of contamination, questions lingered over the plausibility of the explanation, with critics highlighting discrepancies in the investigation’s findings. Nevertheless, WADA opted not to challenge the Chinese authorities’ assertion, citing logistical challenges posed by Covid-related restrictions at that time and the absence of conclusive evidence to refute the contamination narrative. Hence, they were not banned.
Edited by:
Sampurna Pal