Home/Olympics
Home/Olympics
feature-image
feature-image

Last month, the SafeSport Commission released a detailed 277-page report accumulating major findings and suggestions for the change related to Olympic Sports in the USA. In addition to this, the commission highlighted criticism at the SafeSport Centre, formed way back in 2017 to look over the sex abuse cases in the Olympics. 

Watch What’s Trending Now!

“As we engaged in our study, it became clearer with each new piece of evidence that SafeSport has lost the trust of many athletes,” says the reports. Interestingly, this has brought the USA into the headlines across the globe. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Proposed changes to Olympic law

As per the recent news update, the proposed rewrite of the law governing the Olympics has been made to emphasize the need for public funding to help the embattled USA’s center for SafeSports. Interestingly, this has been done to acknowledge the critical role of SafeSport in preventing and addressing the major issues related to abuse and misconduct within the Olympic sports.

article-image
Stemming on the recommendations made by the commission on the USA’s Olympics and Paralympics, there are two significant changes highlighted in the report. The proposed legislation first aims to overhaul the existing 1978 Olympic law to eliminate the “amateur” not only in the title of the law but also throughout the legislation to acknowledge the integral role of professionals in modern-day Olympics. 

ADVERTISEMENT

In addition to this, the commission has also recommended detaching the Athletes Advisory Commission from the existing US Olympics and Paralympics Committee to mitigate the conflicts of interest. But, the major question that arises is why the rewrite of the law “Ted Stevens Olympic, Paralympic, and Grassroots Sports Act” is proposed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Read Top Stories First From EssentiallySports

Click here and check box next to EssentiallySports

 What are the reasons behind the introduction of changes?

Unlike other countries, the USA’s government does not offer funding to its Olympic teams. This has led to discussions about Safe Sports’ funding model. Arising from its annual $20 million allocated from the USOPC, the system’s reliance on “high-use contribution fee” accumulated through individual sports organizations potentially deter these from reporting it to the center.

Top Stories

Josh Allen Makes Lifetime Buffalo Announcement as Pregnant Hailee Steinfeld Receives Bills QB’s Clear Family Plan

NTSB Appeals for Greg Biffle’s Wife’s Alleged In-Flight Text Messages as Crash Investigation Heats Up

Travis Kelce Reveals Real Reason Behind Decision to Snub the Media Amid Retirement Rumors

Sean Strickland Passes on UFC White House Opportunity in Yet Another Bold Confession

Donald Trump Issues Moving Message of Condolence for NASCAR’s Greg Biffle & Family During North Carolina Address

Another Almost Fatal Disaster Surfaces From Statesville Airport Amidst Ongoing Greg Biffle’s Crash Investigation

One of the key findings of this study has been a lack of transparency, accountability, and due process by USOPC, governing bodies, and SafeSport,…This is detrimental both to the movement and to the millions of Americans who participate in it.” Interestingly, despite all the changes, the rewritten bill will not touch upon the core of the funding philosophy, but it will be seeking funding from the government. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Also Read: Beating Paris-Bound Clayton Young, This Kenyan Marathon Runner Took the Win Home at NYC Half Marathon

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT