“Cheating”: European Long Jump Champion Takes a Dig at World Athletics Over Bizarre Decision
Follow Us
According to the World Athletics definition—a long jump is when a participant sprints down a runway and jumps as far as they can from a wooden take-off board into a sandpit in track and field. Then, the distance is measured from the board’s edge to the nearest sand depression. In addition, the format rules, which first mentioned the “take-off board,” reverses in the trial announced by World Athletics CEO Jon Ridgeon, who proposed replacing the take-off board with a “take-off zone.”
This would measure the distance between the athlete’s point of takeoff and their landing in the pit, thus eliminating fouls. Now, the community is divided, while a reigning European champion recently weighed in on the bizarre proposal, including “cheating” in its possible outcome.
Long Jump Pro calls out the cons
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Following Jon Ridgeon’s disclosure of the trial on the Anything But Footy podcast, a flurry of responses ensued, with 2023 European Indoor Champion Jazmin Sawyers heading to Instagram to voice her disapproval of the proposed alteration, which was later reposted on X by @_OwenM_. The multi-sport medalist shared a few videos outlining two advantages and eight disadvantages of the trial, one of which she brashly called “cheating.”
2023 European Indoor Champion Jazmin Sawyers 🇬🇧 speaks out over World Athletics decision to trial a new take-off zone in the long jump ‼️
🎥 Jazmin Sawyers (IG) pic.twitter.com/arRkB1ZGJh
— Owen M (@_OwenM_) February 20, 2024
Sawyers first noted the possible advantages in her thorough analysis, including the chance to watch greater leaps which meant possible new records and the ability to count every jump. However, the 29-year-old British athlete brought up important considerations, especially about grassroots events where it may be difficult to track take-off spots accurately.
Trending
Deion Sanders’ Ex-GF Tracey Edmonds Gushes Over Caleb Williams as He Gets Drafted in Bears
April 26, 2024 05:23 AM EDT
“They Won’t Return Phone Calls “-Dale Jr’s Legendary Short Track Star Reveals NASCAR’s Dark Side Amid Diminishing Interest
April 26, 2024 12:56 PM EDT
“Very Disturbing”: Ex Wife Pilar Sanders Reprimands Coach Prime for “Stupid” Take on Shelomi’s Transfer Portal Decision
April 26, 2024 12:28 PM EDT
Russell Wilson’s Pittsburgh Arrival Followed up by More Good News for Steelers Fans Via Commissioner Goodell
April 26, 2024 11:26 PM EDT
“You Weren’t There”: Pilar Sanders Minces No Word to Call Out Coach Prime for Inadequately Supporting Shelomi’s Career
April 26, 2024 02:17 PM EDT
Get instantly notified of the hottest Olympics stories via Google! Click on Follow Us and Tap the Blue Star.
Follow Us
She brought up the possibility of cheating and other negative aspects, including time limits, eliminating a necessary skill component, less drama, and the audience’s inability to estimate the height of the jump. Some veteran Olympians also joined in the disapproval of the World Athletics statement.
American legend stands against the new rule
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Sawyers’ objection is not unique as she was joined by Carl Lewis, the American long jump icon with four straight Olympic gold medals from 1984 to 1996, who shared his incredulity on X. Lewis highlighted the long jump’s difficulty and claimed that the planned change would remove the most difficult skill from the competition. He also mockingly wrote, “you’re supposed to wait until April 1st for April Fools jokes.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
The internet is still split on the issue, with sportsmen and legends expressing disapproval. It is conceivable that viewpoints will become clearer as the trial continues. Still, should the traditional long jump, a mainstay since the 1896 Olympics, see such a radical transformation? What do you think about this suggested change in one of the longest-existing sports?
Edited by:
Sampurna Pal