
Imago
Indiana Fever guard Caitlin Clark (22) and guard Sophie Cunningham (8) watch from the bench during the first half of a game against the Washington Mystics on Friday, Aug. 15, 2025, at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis.

Imago
Indiana Fever guard Caitlin Clark (22) and guard Sophie Cunningham (8) watch from the bench during the first half of a game against the Washington Mystics on Friday, Aug. 15, 2025, at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis.
One predictable roster move by the Indiana Fever has set off a chain reaction of financial questions that could define their championship window. For the Indiana Fever, securing superstar Caitlin Clark was supposed to be a simple celebration. Instead, it has become the starting point for a complex and anxious debate about the team’s future and the financial fate of another fan favorite.
Watch What’s Trending Now!
The new CBA completely flipped the financial dynamics for a WNBA team. The super max and max contracts now have a higher contribution to the salary cap than before. It affected the roster building of each team as they navigated around the hurdles. However, all that had no bearing on this decision, as it was almost a given the Indiana Fever will do this.
“We have exercised Caitlin Clark’s fourth-year option 🔥.” Announced the franchise. For a novice, the WNBA rookie contract lasts for three years and the franchise has the option to extend it. If the team exercises that decision, the player stays under contract for that fourth year at the league-defined salary on the rookie scale rather than reaching free agency after year three.
Clark is making $528,846 in 2026, per Her Hoop Stats and her current team option in 2027 is for $597,596. “We want those two around for their careers, the duration of their careers,” Fever GM Amber Cox has said regarding Aliyah Boston and Clark. So, of course, this was a long time coming. But what isn’t clear is their team dynamic.
we have exercised Caitlin Clark’s fourth year option 🔥 pic.twitter.com/Vo1UCmqlNA
— Indiana Fever (@IndianaFever) April 28, 2026
According to the new CBA, Clark can negotiate her contract for 2027 to a max according to the EPIC provision, which applies to All-WNBA players. Kelsey Mitchell is on a 1-year super max while Boston has signed a four-year, $6.3 million contract extension with the Indiana Fever, running through the 2029 season. Sophie Cunningham also signed just a year-long deal. Naturally, the fans want the franchise to immediately plan for the future.
Fever Fans Demand Future-Focused Moves After Caitlin Clark Deal
“So let’s start thinking about Sophie now instead of 10 months from now,” appealed a fan. “Extend Sophie so she can settle in one place, obviously she loves her team and she was a big part of you making the playoffs,” pleaded another fan. Cunningham’s contract has been a big topic of conversation after she signed a one-year, $665,000 deal to stay at the Fever.
But she publicly displayed disappointment for her deal, not because of the amount but the years, as she “wanted a home.” Considering the limitations of a short free agency there wasn’t much time to negotiate so she had to settle for a short extension. Yet, its difficult for the Fever to offer her a longer contract, even next year.
“That’s a given, what isn’t is how the Fever will be able to fit CC, AB, and Mitchell under the cap in 2027. they’re potentially stacking close to $4 million on just three players against a cap that’s only around $5.75-7 million,” asked a fan.

Imago
Aug 7, 2025; Phoenix, Arizona, USA; Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham (8) reacts against the Phoenix Mercury during an WNBA game at PHX Arena. Mandatory Credit: Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images
That’s the major sticking point. Boston will approximately make a million dollars a year, slightly less than she could but still significant. Mitchell is on a super for 2026 and will demand a high salary next season as well. They have Clark triggering the EPIC extension and her salary would account for 17% of her cap. It could even be 20% if she wins MVP in 2026. So, keeping those three together is a tier 1 priority, which could block Cunningham from getting a long-term contract. But some fans expect a drastic solution, a paycut by Clark.
“She makes millions on the side, she should take the minimum if she truly wants to win,” suggested a fan. Now, a star player taking a paycut to remain at a championship-level team is not new. This year Satou Sabally went to New York on a 2-year, $1.6 million deal when she could have gotten a supermax for longer at many other teams.
The most popular example is LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh taking a major paycut to form a Big Three at the Heat to win the Championship. But there’s the catch: all three compromised not just one.
For the Fever, Boston has lowered her salary from $1.19 million to $1 million a year. Mitchell has been paid in a supermax, so she could take a cut next season and Caitlin Clark could get a decent salary and also stay with a contender. It will depend on the negotiations and how Cunningham fits into this picture. If the math does not work, Cunningham and Mitchell are premier candidates to leave since they also take a lot of the salary cap.
“Good move. Now is the time to win the championship,” announced a fan. This year has a lot riding on it for the Fever. Their squad should peak after reaching the semifinals despite losing the majority of their core last season. In addition, the roster moves next season could dismantle their current team. Stephanie White has a task on her hands, handling all these expectations or the noise around her job security could become louder.
Written by
Edited by

Snigdhaa Jaiswal
