In the 2022 F1 season, from the get-go, the shaking heads of the drivers inside the cockpit on track have turned heads off track. The phenomenon known as ‘porpoising’ came to light and the team that was dealt the worst hand was Mercedes.

For the previous 8 seasons, the Brackley outfit knew one thing, which was how to bring home silverware and shine like a star. However, the new regulations put them in uncharted waters and below in the pecking order. The team scratched its heads week in and week out, to figure out how to remove the thorn in its side.

Not only is porpoising an issue for the car but also the driver commandeering the vehicle as it leads to an impact on the human body which can be sustained throughout one’s life. The Mercedes boss, Toto Wolff, is adamant since day one that competition can never outweigh safety, and the FIA needs to put its attention immediately.

The Austrian team principal made his point using the data points from the medical research conducted with American Football players relating to head injuries after repetitive impacts throughout their careers. For many years, new reports have surfaced of NFL players with a case of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE).

Watch This Story: Lewis Hamilton Sounds Off the Alarm Bells for Mercedes F1

The athletes suffer major blows, ramifications of which can stay with them for life. As a result, many NFL giants have raised their voices against the issue and are heavily compensated by the league for the shortcoming of the regulations and safety measures.

The controversial series of events in the American sport led to form a hole in its loyal fanbase, and it looks like the top-flight of racing might be on the same track.

Mercedes CEO calls out the FIA

We say ‘Cash is King’ in F1, but it is not in the same ballpark as the NFL. Some of the richest franchises in sports are from this league, which aided them in putting the controversial instances behind them. Yet, it finds itself at crossroads with the same question that the American conference settled with cash.

Trending

Lewis Hamilton Takes Kendall Jenner for a Joyride at the Miami GP, Years After Dating Rumors Surfaced

May 04, 2024 01:05 AM EDT

Bad News for Carlos Sainz as Audi Boss Delivers Disappointing News for 2025 Car

April 29, 2024 11:02 AM EDT

Lewis Hamilton Left Visibly Frustrated at Toto Wolff & Co. & Max Verstappen’s Dig Will Rub Salt in His Wounds

May 03, 2024 11:15 PM EDT

McLaren F1 Legend Hints Max Verstappen Will Join Mercedes for 1 Person & It’s Not Toto Wolff

May 03, 2024 07:38 PM EDT

Max Verstappen to Mercedes: Toto Wolff Breaks Silence on $160 Million Rumored Contract For Dutchman

April 30, 2024 04:37 PM EDT

Get instantly notified of the hottest F1 stories via Google! Click on Follow Us and Tap the Blue Star.

Follow Us

The aftermath of the medical dispute being settled with billion-dollar deals set up a huge stir in the sporting world. The outlook of the fans saw a massive change as an aware audience took its stance against a lasting traumatic injury and backed an alteration in the regulations. Wolff made his stance clear in a recent interview with Autosport.

He said, “It’s very simple: we have always said we can either do nothing, or do the right thing.”

“We have, and FIA has, you can ask them, medical analysis, that frequencies of one or two hertz over several minutes can lead to long term brain damage. We have six to seven hertz over several hours.”

“The FIA has just no option than to do something, and I think that trying to leave things alone, or have teams lobbying for it or against it, it’s just completely irrelevant.”

“It’s a medical question that needs to be answered. And these reports are a reality and they are fact. I don’t think that the gang around the FIA will let themselves be manipulated in either direction.”

“The FIA says it doesn’t want to have an NFL situation.” He concluded.

Mercedes Boss Makes Frustrated Confession Amid Unpredictable F1 Struggles

At the Belgium GP, we expect a fresh alteration to be announced by the FIA. Do you think the FIA should have intervened sooner?