Formula E Driver Hits Back at Red Bull Comments

Published 01/29/2019, 8:45 AM EST


Audi “gains more in Formula E” than it would in Formula 1, says Lucas di Grassi in a strong retort to Red Bull motorsport advisor Helmut Marko’s recent criticism of FE. Marko recently declared that the ABB FIA FE Championship was not on Red Bull’s agenda due to his firm being “racing purists”, and also called the electric series “a marketing excuse from the automotive industry to distract from the

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Audi “gains more in Formula E” than it would in Formula 1, says Lucas di Grassi in a strong retort to Red Bull motorsport advisor Helmut Marko’s recent criticism of FE.

Marko recently declared that the ABB FIA FE Championship was not on Red Bull’s agenda due to his firm being “racing purists”, and also called the electric series “a marketing excuse from the automotive industry to distract from the diesel scandal” with cars that were “so slow”.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

But di Grassi, whose Audi squad is among a high number of major manufacturers to commit to FE programmes in recent years, said the technical development opportunities in the series made it extremely attractive.

Lucas Di Grassi

“Audi gains more here in Formula E than in Formula 1,” di Grassi told Motorsport.com.

“The fact is that every car of Audi in the future will be electric, and we need to understand which factors are limiting us, which are the bests materials and how to develop software to control the engine.

“We have all this development of the electric car that will be used in the future.

“[With] the combustion engine you already know how it works. The interesting thing is discovering how we can make electric cars run fast, [be] more efficient and more cheap.

“This is what we do here. Not only Audi, but everyone. So, this is much more of a commercial development than Formula 1.”

Di Grassi also questioned Marko’s ‘purist’ description of Red Bull.

“Dr Marko said that he is a ‘racing purist’. For me it is an argument [that is] a bit false, because it depends a lot from what this means for people,” di Grassi continued.

“What exactly is this thought? [Does he] defend races with horses instead of cars?

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

“If he is a real racing purist, he should defend horse races. Or races with just combustion engines, without hybrid systems as F1 is nowadays.

“Or cars with full manual gearboxes, without paddleshift, [which is] how it is nowadays in F1 – it is an open argument.

“This is more his personal opinion of saying: ‘look, I don’t want to compete in Formula E, I’m too old for this and want to do combustion races in F1’.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

“F1 is still the most important category of the world of motorsport, nobody can deny this. But the future of the manufacturers is electric.”

Helmut Marko

SHARE THIS ARTICLE :

ADVERTISEMENT

Dhruv George

12017 articles

Dhruv George is a senior Formula One and NASCAR analyst for EssentiallySports, having authored nearly 12000 articles spanning different sports like F1, NASCAR, Tennis, NFL, and eSports. He graduated with a PG Diploma in Journalism from the Xavier Institute of Communications. Dhruv has also conducted interviews with F1 driver Pierre Gasly and Moto2 rider Tony Arbolino.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT