Most of the insiders you ask about Pete Alonso have only one answer: he should stay with the Mets, and that is the best for both the team and him. Not only insiders, but even fans jumped on this and started to say that the best way forward for the Mets is to keep Pete Alonso, or it might cost them more money to buy replacements. And now even Mets players are jumping to the side of Pete Alonso to show his importance to the team.

In a recent interview, Mets player Sean Manaea talked about Pete Alonso and what he thinks will happen. Manaea said, “I love Pete to death. He’s the man. Ultimately, I just want whatever’s going to be best for him and his family…. Hope he’s back with us.” The problem is that if the Mets don’t get Alonso back, they might have to go after free agents, and it is not going to be cheap this offseason’s market.

The Pete Alonso situation with the New York Mets and David Stearns has shown repeated delays. Alonso signed a 2-year, $54 million deal with the Mets in February 2025, including a player opt-out after the season. Despite his consistent production, including setting the franchise home run record of 253 homers this past season, the Mets waited until the last moment to commit, signalling a lack of urgency.

This time around, the stakes are higher because multiple clubs are chasing Alonso and are willing to pay for a long-term deal. Sources project Alonso could command a five-year, $165 million contract or a six-year, $182 million deal in free agency. But the first base free-agent market took a hit after Josh Naylor signed a five-year, $92.5 million contract with the Seattle Mariners, which could give the Mets a more manageable window to act.

If the Mets fail to lock in Alonso, they may pivot to Cody Bellinger, who matches Alonso in status as a power bat and defensive versatility but at a higher projected cost. Bellinger hit 29 home runs and 98 RBIs in 2025, and analysts indicate a contract in the vicinity of five years and $135 million. Because the Mets are also targeting other major free agents, this would place substantial strain on payroll flexibility. In contrast, re-signing Alonso now represents less payroll disruption and ensures continuity of their franchise cornerstone.

The New York Mets know Pete Alonso is their safest financial and competitive path forward, yet the hesitation continues. If losing Alonso leads to scrambling for Cody Bellinger, the price tag will say everything. David Stearns can either pay now or explain later why sentiment became cheaper than production.

The Red Sox are also going after Pete Alonso, according to reports

Pretty soon, we’re all going to need a scorecard to keep track of who’s shopping for whom, because Boston has apparently decided it’s time to stop window-browsing and start stealing the neighbor’s furniture. The Mets might want to lock the doors, because Pete Alonso is suddenly looking like a fair game, and the Red Sox aren’t exactly whispering about it. Let’s just say this chase has everyone pretending they aren’t panicking.

The Boston Red Sox are pursuing Pete Alonso, drawn by his power-hitting and durability. Alonso played all 162 games in each of the last two seasons, showing reliability at the plate. In 2025, he batted .272 with 38 home runs and 126 RBIs, providing the offensive production Boston seeks. His presence could energize the fan base and anchor the lineup for 2026.

However, Boston would face hurdles if it moves for Alonso, starting with his defensive metrics at first base. Alonso posted negative Outs Above Average in each of the past two seasons, raising questions about his glove. Additionally, competition for his services is intense, and his contract demand will be steep, making financial flexibility a concern. If he joins, Alonso’s bat and clubhouse presence promise impact, but Boston must weigh risk and reward carefully.

If the Red Sox actually land Pete Alonso, the ripple will reach straight to Queens. The Mets might suddenly discover how quiet the market sounds when somebody steals their centerpiece. Boston will either celebrate a historic coup or explain why the furniture never arrived.