feature-image

Imago

feature-image

Imago

The seeds for this issue were sown in 2015. One day, the now Buffs’ safety broke the school’s no-phone policy while calling his mother, Pilar. But when Josh Darjean, a security officer, reminded him of the rule and decided to course correct with “unnecessary force” as shared by Deion Sanders in 2016, the issue escalated to violence. It ended with $115,000 in medical bills and unstable employment for Darjean.

Terrell Owens holding Dude Wipes XL

He decided to sue Deion Sanders’s son in 2016, but the father wasn’t convinced. “He [Darjean] knew he was gonna be dismissed from his job for the way he handled this situation and others prior, consequently, he produced an injury completely UNRELATED to this incident,” Sanders stated that year. But fast forward to 2024, the case only got further jumbled up.

Watch What’s Trending Now!

For instance, Shilo didn’t show up for a trial that was set in early 2022. It is said that the notice for the trial was sent to an address in South Carolina. But Shilo hasn’t lived there on a permanent basis since 2020 and this confusion resulted in a default judgment by the court; He had to pay $11.89 million.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post this, the athlete filed a petition of relief under Chapter 7 of Colorado’s Bankruptcy Code in an attempt to get his debt either partially or fully discharged. Well, a federal judge has now issued a ruling in favor of the Colorado player. As reported by USA Today, Judge Michael E. Romero ruled that the case would need a trial to confirm whether Shilo Sanders was “willful and malicious” in his assault.

“This Court has already determined the issues of willful and malicious behavior will be re-litigated in this proceeding… That determination will necessarily involve an examination of any justification, including self-defense, offered by Sanders for his allegedly willful and malicious behavior.”

ADVERTISEMENT

article-image

Imago

Had it been ruled the other way, it would have been a massive jolt for Shilo in his effort to erase his $11 million debt to Darjean. He would have had to pay millions to Darjean, pending any appeal. Instead, his case will now be fought on numerous fronts.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Shilo Sanders: What was the bankruptcy ruling all about?

As shared by Shilo’s attorneys, the reason the athlete filed for bankruptcy was because he wanted a “fresh start, free from the oppressive burdens of his debt.” However, the law has some exceptions where it prevents debts from being discharged. This is something that could either positively or negatively affect Shilo’s case.

‘Willful and malicious injury by the debtor’ is one such exception. In fact, in response to the athlete’s bankruptcy filing, Darjean’s attorneys raised complaints and one of those mentioned that Shilo Sanders should not be discharged from the debt, as it was a result of willful and malicious intent. That’s something that Judge Michael E. Romero wants to see under trial.

ADVERTISEMENT

While the judge didn’t agree with Darjean’s attorneys’ points regarding willful and malicious intent, he did agree that the issues of causation and damages were litigated in state court, not Shilo Sanders’s state of mind during the incident in 2015.

“The State Court Order and Judgment (in Texas) are devoid of any discussion of Sanders’ intent,” the judge wrote. “Given this lack of findings, the Court is reluctant to conclude the issue of self-defense was fully and fairly litigated in state court.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“Sanders pled self-defense in his state court answer, but he obviously was not at trial and did not present any evidence regarding his state of mind,” the judge wrote. “One could argue the state court necessarily rejected all Sanders’ pled defenses when it determined he committed assault. However, the State Court Order and Judgment make no mention of self-defense, or any justification offered by Sanders for his actions. There is no indication the state court considered Sanders’ state of mind or whether his alleged apprehension of danger was reasonable.”

So, what’s the next in this case?

The judge also stated that “issues of willful act, malicious injury, or self-defense and those matters will be determined in this proceeding.” One can infer that a trial will be conducted sometime in the future.

ADVERTISEMENT

Share this with a friend:

Link Copied!

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Written by

author-image

Soheli Tarafdar

4,135 Articles

Soheli Tarafdar is the Lead College Football Writer at EssentiallySports, anchoring the ES Marquee Saturdays Live NewsCenter. In this role, she leads real-time coverage on game days, delivering breaking news and insights as the action unfolds. Some of her most popular work has come from digging into locker room chatter and social media clues that reveal the stories behind the scoreboards. She joined EssentiallySports with a strong grasp of college football circuits and a genuine love for the game. What began as a fan’s voice has grown into a career shaped by sharp reporting and impactful storytelling. Soheli also continues to refine her voice as part of the EssentiallySports Journalistic Excellence Program, helping drive a fan-first approach to football coverage.

Know more

Edited by

editor-image

Jagriti Choudhry

ADVERTISEMENT