Ferrari finally heard the prayers of Tifosi and their drivers and pulled off a brilliant strategy in the Canadian GP. This came after a disappointing qualifying as Charles Leclerc didn’t make it through Q3 while Carlos Sainz received a penalty for impeding. Despite starting P10 and P11 respectively, Ferrari’s recovery was flawless with good pace & strategy as they finished P4 for Leclerc and P5 for Sainz. Regardless, Charles was vocal about the Scuderia’s qualifying errors.

After a series of miscommunication, strategy mishaps, and poor decision-making from Ferrari, Charles Leclerc publicly expressed frustration on radio during qualifying in Montreal with Ferrari’s decision-making. “I had a clear opinion and a clear intuition, but we did the opposite,” he said angrily, emphasizing the team’s tendency to make erroneous choices in difficult situations. These instances prompted internal discussions within Ferrari to analyze and address the recurring issues. Ferrari’s team boss, reflecting on Charles Leclerc’s disappointing qualifying performance, acknowledges the challenges faced by the driver in decision-making.

Frederic Vasseur sheds light on the significance of joint decision-making and the limitations faced by drivers on the track. He explains as per Motorsport Germany, “A driver cannot make a decision alone because he does not know what is happening around him on the track. That means it has to be a joint decision.” Vasseur recognizes the need to strike a balance between trusting the driver’s instincts and considering the overall picture of what other teams are doing.

A Shocking Prediction Comes Charles Leclerc’s Way 16 Days After His Inexplicable Social Media Move

The challenges faced by Charles Leclerc in recent races underscore the significance of joint decision-making between drivers and their teams. But that is the intricate nature of F1 and it requires comprehensive understanding, while tensions can arise due to differing opinions collaborative decision-making remains the key to success.

Frederic Vasseur implies luck defied Charles Leclerc

Despite the difficulties, Vasseur acknowledges that joint decision-making is essential. He acknowledges that sometimes the decisions made will be right, while other times they may be wrong. Vasseur states, “There has to be a joint decision; sometimes you’re right and sometimes you’re wrong, but there’s no obvious way to solve the problem.”

He highlights the element of luck involved and suggests that success in qualifying often relies on adopting strategies employed by the majority of teams. Fred adds “It’s not always easy, and sometimes it’s also a matter of luck. In qualifying, I think that in the end the strategy was probably enough to get into Q3 because it was a strategy used by 90 percent of the teams.”

Trending

Lando Norris Faces Brutal Injury After Party With Martin Garrix Goes Wrong Ahead of Miami GP

April 27, 2024 07:33 PM EDT

Lando Norris’ Brutal Injury Revealed; Brit May Be Ready in Time for Miami GP

April 28, 2024 02:09 PM EDT

Lando Norris Puts Miami GP in Jeopardy, Will Pato O’Ward Take His Spot?

April 28, 2024 03:00 PM EDT

Adrian Newey to Ferrari: “Poor” Carlos Sainz’s Biggest Loss After Frederic Vasseur Pushes Spaniard Out Says Ex Ferrari Boss

April 27, 2024 09:05 PM EDT

Adrian Newey’s Close Friend Breaks Silence on Potential Move to Frederic Vasseur’s Camp

April 26, 2024 07:58 PM EDT

Get instantly notified of the hottest F1 stories via Google! Click on Follow Us and Tap the Blue Star.

Follow Us

While collaborative decision-making is crucial in navigating the complexities of race dynamics and optimizing performance on the track, we hope Ferrari keeps on accelerating in terms of strategical decisions and finally get onto that front grid which they deserve.

WATCH THIS STORY | Charles Leclerc’s Spinning High Speed Crash at the 2023 Miami GP Qualifying