Home/MLB
feature-image

USA Today via Reuters

feature-image

USA Today via Reuters

Every summer, the New York Mets fans brace for chaos disguised as strategy, and 2025 is no exception. Just when the roster seemed to settle, whispers are turning into trade buzz louder than Citi Field’s boos. A familiar face—well-paid, well-aged, and occasionally well-injured—is now the center of deadline temptation. Rival teams smell opportunity, the front office smells leverage, and the fanbase smells something burning behind that $78 million curtain.

As the deadline days approach, new trade targets are starting to pop up from teams, but some of them are surprising. There was news of Jasson Dominguez to get traded and some other names, but one other name that has come up is Starling Marte, and it looks like he is a hot commodity.

In his recent post, Mets reporter Mike Puma reported, Teams have been asking the Mets about Starling Marte.” Yes, not a team but teams, because for a guy who is injury-prone, Marte has done a good job. It isn’t the first time Marte’s name surfaced in trade talks before this surprisingly renewed interest. David Stearns publicly confirmed discussions during the last offseason, long before this latest Mets deadline buzz.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Now that teams “have been asking” again, it underscores renewed urgency despite his age and prior injury concerns. That makes it surprising now, as the Mets currently lead their division and value continuity above uncertainty.

This season, Marte offers a respectable slash line of .270/.353/.387 with four homers, twenty RBI, and five stolen bases. He has appeared in only fifty‑eight games and missed over two weeks with a bruised right knee before returning on July 22nd. Despite limited outfield time—just five games and roughly thirty‑one innings—he maintains value as a designated hitter and occasional defender. Teams respect his veteran presence combined with balanced splits versus lefties and righties, offering lineup flexibility.

Given Starling Marte’s injury history and reduced field time in recent seasons, any trade risk remains tempered by opportunity. It isn’t clearly a bad trade if he lands in a club that utilizes him efficiently and keeps him healthy. And it isn’t a sure win either, as his foot speed, range, and plate rhythm have noticeably declined. Yet any team acquiring Marte who keeps him fit, will benefit from significant defensive instincts and veteran production.

So while fans debate whether this is savvy maneuvering or deadline desperation, the clock keeps ticking. What began as whispers around a crowded DH spot now flirts with full-blown roster roulette. The Mets may preach stability, but nothing screams “contender” like shopping for an $78 million part-time outfielder. If Marte goes, it won’t just test his knees—it’ll test whether the Mets know what they’re doing at all.

What’s your perspective on:

Is trading Starling Marte a smart move, or are the Mets risking their playoff hopes?

Have an interesting take?

The Mets fanbase is split in two after the Marte trade rumors resurface

Just when Mets fans thought the drama had peaked with Daniel Vogelbach memes and bullpen roulette, reality served seconds. The franchise that once handed $78 million to Starling Marte now finds itself debating whether to keep or flip him—again. With the New York Mets leading the division and the trade deadline looming, logic has left the group chat. What’s left is a fanbase torn between sentiment, skepticism, and Soto-sized expectations.

“Have to keep him, I think.” Four words, but they echo like Citi Field fireworks. In a lineup full of streaky swings, Starling Marte brings veteran rhythm and lineup balance. He’s hitting .270 and showing steady hands—even if not often in the outfield. When playoff pressure builds, experience matters more than payroll math or trade-bait theories. The Mets should keep him simply because October doesn’t wait for rehab assignments.

“Bye… But who is asking :)” cuts like a sarcastic farewell with bonus eye-roll energy. For some Mets fans, Marte’s $78 million price tag outweighs his occasional doubles and charm. He’s missed chunks of seasons, lost his defensive role, and hasn’t stolen bases like before. In a deadline race, fans want reliability—not nostalgia or empty locker room intangibles. They’d rather move on because dead cap space doesn’t steal second base.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

“He’s been much better than expected this year, and he’s the only guy who can hit lefties on this roster.” That’s not fan bias—it’s backed by Marte’s .270/.353/.387 slash line in just 58 games. He’s posted balanced splits and remains one of the few Mets with consistent at-bats versus lefties. Despite missing time with a bruised knee, he’s had multi-hit games in four straight starts. For all the trade talk, his bat might still be the most dependable one standing.

“Trading him wouldn’t make much sense unless the Mets are going to be adding a big bat. Marte is having a solid season for a team that needs a longer lineup.” He’s got 20 RBI, 5 stolen bases, and 7 doubles in just 58 games played. Even with limited outfield work, his 90.1 mph average exit velocity proves he’s still barreling balls. For a team thin on right-handed threats, his situational hitting can’t be easily replaced. Subtracting Marte without a stronger bat coming in just shortens the fight for October.

“I’d do it, he’s a great locker room guy, but his career is almost over.” That’s the classic Mets fan tug-of-war between heart and hard truth. Starling Marte turns 37 this year and has played only 58 games so far. His sprint speed and stolen base totals have dipped, signaling a decline more than a resurgence. For this fan, selling now means cashing value before Father Time files the retirement papers himself.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

The $78 million question isn’t whether Marte still has value—it’s who dares to define it. Mets fans know chaos is part of the package, but even chaos demands a return policy. Between nostalgia-fueled loyalty and spreadsheet logic, the front office has a delicate swing to take. One thing’s certain: if Marte is moved, it won’t just be a trade—it’ll be a referendum on belief vs. bookkeeping.

ADVERTISEMENT

0
  Debate

Is trading Starling Marte a smart move, or are the Mets risking their playoff hopes?

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT