Home/NBA
Home/NBA
feature-image

via Imago

feature-image

via Imago

google_news_banner

The Golden State Warriors and Jonathan Kuminga are stuck in a high-stakes game of chicken. With an October 1 deadline to accept a $7.9 million qualifying offer, the young forward and his agent, Aaron Turner, are pushing for a better long-term deal. This standoff has frozen the Warriors’ entire offseason, preventing them from signing veterans like Al Horford and Seth Curry. The Warriors have already increased their offer significantly, putting a three-year, $75.2 million contract on the table. However, the catch is the third year, which is a team option, not the player option Kuminga desires.

Watch What’s Trending Now!

The situation is tense, with Turner publicly stating, “There’s a lot of upside if he wants to pick where he wants to go and the opportunity to be an unrestricted free agent.” Reports now suggest this public negotiation strategy has backfired spectacularly. Instead of forcing the Warriors to cave, the very public threats from Kuminga’s camp have reportedly alarmed the rest of the NBA. According to insider reports, the Warriors have effectively called Turner’s bluff, refusing to grant the player option. More importantly, the fallout is not limited to the Bay Area.

Turner’s methods have caused a cold reaction from the other 29 NBA teams. “From what I hear around the league, no team, including the Warriors, would want to give Turner the power to keep negotiating in public even after signing a deal,” Tim Kawakami of The SF Standard revealed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

“The Warriors caving on the third-year option could set that in motion again starting next summer, when Kuminga would have only one year left of team control.”

This fear of perpetual tension has caused a cooling of interest from potential trade partners. It leaves Kuminga and Turner leveraging implied tension as their last bargaining chip. The idea is that the Warriors would not want an unhappy player on a one-year deal, especially one who could block trades.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

However, the Warriors’ front office, led by Mike Dunleavy and Joe Lacob, appears ready to face that awkwardness. Their primary goal is protecting Kuminga’s trade value, not necessarily ensuring his happiness as a role player. Also, let us not forget that the team has previously dealt with contract tensions involving accomplished players. Think about Klay Thompson, for instance. Though that ended with his exit, such tough negotiations won’t be a new experience for the team.

The financial reality also heavily favors the Warriors’ offer; by choosing the qualifying offer, Kuminga would be turning down nearly $67 million in guaranteed money over the next two seasons, a massive gamble for a player yet to secure a full-time starting role.

article-image

via Imago

Read Top Stories First From EssentiallySports

Click here and check box next to EssentiallySports

This stalemate is concluding with the Warriors holding firm, and the rest of the league seemingly backing their play by distancing themselves from the situation. This stance from the Warriors serves as a strong warning to Kuminga’s camp about the risks of their current path.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

A costly gamble for Jonathan Kuminga’s future

Accepting the one-year qualifying offer is far from a guaranteed victory for Jonathan Kuminga. While it offers a path to unrestricted free agency, it comes with immense financial risk and potential professional consequences. Analyst Sam Vecenie laid out the brutal math earlier this week, noting, “Let’s call it 67 million over the next two seasons, which means you need Jonathan Kuminga to make $35 million a year basically in free agency after taking the qualifying offer.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

That would be an incredibly high bar for any player, let alone one whose fit in Golden State has been inconsistent. Furthermore, choosing the qualifying offer could backfire on the court. The Warriors would have little incentive to feature a player who is essentially a lame-duck and who has openly challenged the organization. Vecenie added, “They will have no reason to like, really give you the chance to like, go out and go nuts and ball.”

This could hurt Kuminga’s ability to put up the kind of stats needed to justify a massive contract in free agency next summer, creating a vicious cycle that devalues him. And the agent’s acknowledgment of the unpleasant reality highlights the dilemma. Turner admitted that playing on the qualifying offer would not be “a good feeling” for Kuminga.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

The player would be sacrificing both money and a guaranteed larger role elsewhere. The Warriors’ final offer, while not including the desired player option, still represents life-changing security. So, as the clock ticks down to the October 1 deadline, the pressure is mounting on Kuminga to decide whether the gamble of betting on himself is worth potentially alienating his current team and walking away from a fortune.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT