

In the stands, generations stood shoulder-to-shoulder, bundled in red and gold, clinging to a tradition that’s outlasted eras. Arrowhead isn’t just where the Chiefs play. It’s where Kansas City feels like Kansas City. But now, with political gridlock threatening its future, even Patrick Mahomes might not be able to scramble out of this one. It’s not just a relocation debate—it’s an existential crisis for Kansas City’s soul.
Arrowhead Stadium, the deafening cathedral where Mahomes built his dynasty and Lamar Hunt dreamed big, is suddenly facing a ticking clock. The lease is set to expire in January 2031, and while the Hunt family has pledged $300 million toward renovations, they need more than goodwill to keep Arrowhead standing. Until this week, that help didn’t seem to be coming.
On Wednesday, May 14, KSHB 41’s Charlie Keegan confirmed the Missouri Senate ended its 2024 session without addressing Senate Bill 80—a critical proposal designed to offer state support for stadium projects tied to the Chiefs, Royals, and potentially even the Cardinals. “The @MissouriSenate just adjourned for the 2024 session. It did not vote on SB80,” Keegan tweeted. “The proposal is dead barring a special session.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
For the Chiefs and their loyal fanbase, the silence was deafening. Without SB80, the franchises are staring down a future where public-private partnership collapses—and relocation rumors gain steam. But then, a glimmer.
The @MissouriSenate just adjourned for the 2024 session. It did not vote on SB80, the proposal to give breaks to Chiefs and Royals (and potentially Cardinals) money for stadium projects. The proposal is dead barring a special session. @KSHB41 pic.twitter.com/ukDe2CKsny
— Charlie Keegan (@CharlieKeegan41) May 14, 2025
On the other hand, Kansas Governor Laura Kelly is doing everything she can to lure the NFL franchise. On May 9, she passed a bill with more incentives for the sports teams. They modified the Sales Tax and Revenue (STAR) Bond program to contribute up to 70% of the costs of new stadiums. All this forced the Missouri Governor Mike Kehoe to take notice.
It’s not just about legacy. Millions of dollars in revenue also need to be secured. Patrick Mahomes’ franchise did a study in 2023, claiming they generated $28.8 million in annual tax revenue for Missouri with 4,590 jobs in Jackson County. Reason enough to take serious measures, but the Senate adjournment means otherwise. But now, they might have a plan in place.
What’s your perspective on:
Is Arrowhead's fate a political failure, or a chance for Kansas City to redefine its legacy?
Have an interesting take?
Patrick Mahomes & co. have hope, but it’s a tightrope
On May 13, Missouri Governor Mike Kehoe stepped into the void left by the Senate’s inaction. His proposal? A new funding framework to retain both the Chiefs and Royals long-term. The plan offers a 50% public match for stadium costs—primarily through bonds—paired with a 10% tax credit on any private investment from the teams. Crucially, it avoids new taxes and instead relies on redirected revenues like ticket surcharges and incremental tax gains around the stadium site.
This fresh pitch came just days after Kansas Governor Laura Kelly passed the aggressive countermeasure, further escalating the border war between Kansas and Missouri for the Chiefs’ future. Faced with that leverage shift, Kehoe’s proposal seeks to reassure fans, economists, and NFL execs alike that Missouri is still in the game. “We cannot lose the Chiefs or the Royals,” he said during his May 13 announcement, noting the cultural and economic footprint both franchises leave behind.
The numbers back him up. A 2023 economic impact report commissioned by the Chiefs estimated the franchise contributes over $28.8 million annually in Missouri tax revenue and supports more than 4,590 jobs in Jackson County alone. Meanwhile, a similar study from the Royals pegged the value of a new downtown stadium district at 8,400 jobs, $440 million in labor income, and $1.01 billion in economic output per year.

ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
The Missouri House wasted no time responding. That same day—May 13—the lower chamber passed a revised version of the funding bill that includes Kehoe’s framework. In a statement following the vote, House Minority Leader Ashley Aune said, “The House today demonstrated Missouri’s strong commitment to keeping the Royals and Chiefs in our state for many decades to come. These teams are vital parts of Kansas City’s culture, and their loss would be a blow to the local psyche and economy.”
Still, the Senate’s silence casts a shadow. With the 2024 session now adjourned, the only way forward is via a special legislative session—a move Kehoe has not yet formally announced. Without Senate backing, the proposal remains in limbo, and the risk of Kansas poaching the Chiefs grows more real by the week.
As for Patrick Mahomes, the franchise quarterback hasn’t weighed in publicly—yet. But his loyalty to Arrowhead is well known. “There’s nothing like it,” he said last year after another raucous home playoff win. “The crowd, the energy—it’s part of who we are.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
And so, Arrowhead’s fate now rests with a different kind of playmaker: not a quarterback, but a coalition of lawmakers. Until the Capitol delivers its decision, Chiefs fans are stuck watching the clock tick—hoping the next drive ends in a deal, not a departure.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Is Arrowhead's fate a political failure, or a chance for Kansas City to redefine its legacy?