The Ryder Cup, long a symbol of pride and tradition, is now facing controversy as the US Team receives $500,000 per player to compete. Known for past issues with team spirit and connection to the event, this move has sparked heated debate in the media. Among the critics, former European Ryder Cup Captain Darren Clarke appears especially disappointed.

At the end of last year, the PGA of America issued a statement that ensured every player on the American roster was getting a steady stipend of $200,000. Moreover, they increased the sum to be donated to charity in each player’s name from $200,000 to $300,000. Although the media received the charitable implications of the action well, the stipend stood out as a sore thumb. Speaking out on his frustrations on the Golf Channel, Clarke shared his candid, unflinching thoughts on the stipend.

“No. No. 100% that does not sit well with me. You know, you can ask any of those guys—not the European team—would they accept money? Everyone to a T would say no. It’s not about money. That’s not what the Ryder Cup is about. The Ryder Cup was never about money,” Clarke expressed his strong disapproval. Clearly, money has never motivated the Ryder Cup players to play for their country. That has especially stood out in the European squad. And Clarke believes that if the European Ryder Cup Association offered a stipend, none of the Europeans would budge even a bit to accept that.

“The Europeans would live and die just to make the team,” Clarke declared. To justify that sentiment, he brought up Matt Wallace’s reaction to not making the European team. “I think if you Google it, look at Matt Wallace’s reaction when he just missed out, knowing he was going to miss out after Switzerland—that tells you what it means to Europeans to make the team.”

English golfer Wallace teared up on TV after the Omega European Masters in Switzerland. He began his Ryder Cup campaign strong with a win at Crans-sur-Sierre GC but later slipped to 12th, missing the top 6 automatic spots. Reflecting on the struggle, Wallace said, “It’s been a hard couple of weeks, probably more emotionally than physically [with] wanting to show myself and try to get into the Ryder Cup team when it means so much to you.”

This incident is not a standalone event for the European squad. But it’s enough to throw light on their emotional attachment to playing the Ryder Cup. Not only does it provide them with an opportunity to unite under a shared spirit. But it also lets them play for their country and bring honor and legacy to European golf. For them, financial gains defeat the entire point of the heated competition of the Ryder Cup.

While Clarke admitted that he doesn’t mean to put down his fellow American challengers, the European player left no room for interpretation on his feelings about the stipend. “I’m not demeaning any of the Americans for the disappointment not making the team or whatever, but the money just doesn’t sit right with me. That’s certainly, as a European player, when asked about money, that does not come into the equation.”

Well, that makes Europe much more of a team, as Clarke himself couldn’t help but take pride in. It’s clear that the European side of the Ryder Cup is disappointed with the stipend situation. And it’s not just Darren Clarke expressing his contempt loudly.

Darren Clarke is not alone in his disapproval of the US Team being paid to play

Aside from Darren Clarke, ex-Ryder Cup captain Paul McGinley couldn’t resist bashing the US Ryder Cup Association for its decision. McGinley shared how this was a huge mistake from the American golfing side, revealing how that might affect the connection with the fans, with increasing ticket prices. Moreover, he touched upon the traditional side of the Ryder Cup, pointing out the glory and honor of the event over financial gains.

“For the kind of money these guys are making nowadays, to get half a million each is tiny money. It’s huge in everybody’s life, but not theirs. Seve Ballesteros, Nick Faldo, Ian Woosnam never got paid. Curtis Strange, Lanny Wadkins and Jack Nicklaus didn’t. These modern players have pushed the envelope to get half a million dollars. It’s the mentality of rattling the money tree everywhere they can at the moment,” McGinley openly criticized his American counterparts. No doubt half a million is minuscule in relation to the worth each player is already making on the circuit. And that’s exactly what defeats the entire point of the stipend.

The golfing legend, Tiger Woods, piped in, adding, “It was never about getting paid.” Surprisingly, he supported the incentives for charity, much to other veterans’ dismay. What has gained attention is the European players’ reaction in contrast. Reflecting the purity of the competition, Rory McIlroy remarked, “I personally would pay for the privilege to play on the Ryder Cup,” Shane Lowry echoed similar sentiments, stating, “I love the tournament, and I just want to be involved. I don’t care whether I get paid or not.”

However, the American golfers have kept their quiet, accepting the payment. They justified the stipend with the charitable implications of the money. However, this brings forward a disturbing narrative: American golf’s obsession with financial profits over shared success. And their decision just fuels the criticisms even more.