
via Imago
NASCAR, Motorsport, USA Cup Series-Practice and Qualifying Sep 6, 2025 Madison, Illinois, USA NASCAR Cup Series driver Shane van Gisbergen 88 looks on during practice and qualifying for the Enjoy Illinois 300 at World Wide Technology Raceway. Madison World Wide Technology Raceway Illinois USA, EDITORIAL USE ONLY PUBLICATIONxINxGERxSUIxAUTxONLY Copyright: xJoexPuetzx 20250906_tbs_pa2_018

via Imago
NASCAR, Motorsport, USA Cup Series-Practice and Qualifying Sep 6, 2025 Madison, Illinois, USA NASCAR Cup Series driver Shane van Gisbergen 88 looks on during practice and qualifying for the Enjoy Illinois 300 at World Wide Technology Raceway. Madison World Wide Technology Raceway Illinois USA, EDITORIAL USE ONLY PUBLICATIONxINxGERxSUIxAUTxONLY Copyright: xJoexPuetzx 20250906_tbs_pa2_018
In NASCAR, drivers often point fingers after a tough loss and are quick to blame factors like equipment or rivals. Take Austin Dillon after the 2018 Daytona 500, where he admitted to intentionally bumping Aric Almirola but later blamed Almirola’s blocking for forcing his hand. That kind of post-race reflection keeps fans hooked on the drama. At Bristol’s high-banked concrete short track, where tire management can make or break a run due to rapid wear on the steep turns, similar frustrations boiled over.
Watch What’s Trending Now!
Shane van Gisbergen entered the 2025 playoffs seeded sixth with 22 playoff points, buoyed by four road course victories that showcased his skill on twists and turns. But ovals like Bristol painted a contrasting picture, and his misfortunes peaked there with a 26th-place finish that sealed his elimination. So, was it the tires or the driver? Let’s hear straight from SVG on what went down.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Shane van Gisbergen’s tire nightmare unveiled
On his Frontstretch post-race interview, Shane van Gisbergen laid out the chaos that unfolded at Bristol Motor Speedway, where tire degradation turned the 500-lap grind into a survival test. “Yeah, it was pretty crazy. You’d be feeling like you were good and then all of a sudden, you’d feel the cords start to show up and then you knew you only had three laps before you had the pit,” he explained, capturing how the Goodyear tires shredded unexpectedly under the track’s demands.
This sudden fall-off caught him off guard in the first stage, echoing the 2024 spring race at Bristol, where extreme wear led to a record 54 lead changes as teams pitted frantically. For SVG, the issue stemmed from not adapting his driving style quickly enough to conserve rubber on the half-mile oval’s 24-28 degree banks, which amplify stress and force precise throttle work to avoid cording.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Drawing from his Supercars roots, Shane van Gisbergen noted similarities but key differences in handling. “Yeah, yeah. A few times, Tailon Bend, Perf was old, and Perf was always like that. So, yeah, a few things, but the way this tire is and the way you save it is so much different from what I’m used to at home,” he said, highlighting how Australian tracks like Tailem Bend prepped him for wear but not the unique saving techniques needed here. This mismatch compounded early mistakes, like the spins on laps 238 and 269, from contact with William Byron and Ty Dillon, pushing him back and burning through tires faster.
It’s a classic Bristol trap, seen in the 2021 dirt experiment where multiple failures prompted procedural changes from NASCAR, underscoring why rubber rules this venue. SVG didn’t dodge responsibility amid the madness. “Yeah, we just put ourselves in a bad spot early to capitalize on it, but yeah, you expect that car at the end, and yeah, people are doing nuts, desperate things, but yeah, unfortunately, I lost too much time early in the race,” he admitted, tying the tire woes to positioning errors in a race NASCAR boosted with extra tire sets mid-event due to widespread degradation.
His rookie year story, from road course dominance to oval struggles, adds context, much like other internationals adapting, but the tire bite ended his long-shot bid, leaving lessons for future ovals. While SVG grappled with the fallout from his tire troubles, the night was capped with a standout performance that locked in advancement for one driver who mastered the same challenges.
What’s your perspective on:
Is tire management the real king at Bristol, or do driver skills still reign supreme?
Have an interesting take?
Christopher Bell’s emotional Bristol triumph
Christopher Bell powered through Bristol’s tire-eating chaos to claim victory in the No. 20 Toyota, marking his fourth win of 2025 and completing Joe Gibbs Racing’s Round of 16 sweep. “All night long, I don’t know, old tires just really, really pushed up in the middle of the corners, so I was hoping that those guys on old tires would push up, and they did,” Bell told USA Network, explaining how he exploited rivals’ worn rubber on the final restart to edge past Alex Bowman and hold off Brad Keselowski. This strategic play, amid 14 cautions and extra tire allocations, solidified his spot in the Round of 12.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
The win carried extra weight after a difficult week. “Most importantly, this week’s obviously been a very tough week, and there’s a lot on our mind, and just this one’s for Charlie (Kirk),” Bell shared emotionally, dedicating it to the 31-year-old political activist Charlie Kirk, who was sh*t on September 10. His composure shone through, fending off challengers in a race where tire management dictated pace, much like his earlier successes at short tracks.
Bell reflected on the grit required. “I was able to get by or get underneath Bowman. It wasn’t pretty there at the end, but we got her done,” he added, underscoring the raw battles that defined the 500-lapper. This triumph not only boosted team momentum but also offered a poignant moment, turning personal loss into on-track fuel as the playoffs intensify.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Is tire management the real king at Bristol, or do driver skills still reign supreme?