Home/US Sports
feature-image

via Imago

feature-image

via Imago

The 12th race at Saratoga was buzzing with tension and excitement from the horse racing community, featuring an allowance for New York-breds on the Mellon Turf course, set at a classic distance of one and one-eighth miles. The horses took off from the gate with a bang, and you could feel the excitement in the crowd as they raced into what everyone thought would be a well-paced race at the right distance.

After everything calmed down, Fidelightcayut, owned by R.T. Racing Stables and Hablan Los Caballos, LLC and sired by Leofric, confidently crossed the finish line first, securing a win that paid out $10.80. The official Equibase chart first showed the race as if everything went according to plan: final placements, times, and fractions were all listed. Racegoers and bettors were on the same page about the results—Fidelightcayut was clearly the winner of the one-and-one-eighth-mile contest, just as it was advertised.

Then, a keen observer noticed something wasn’t quite right. It was Dave Grening from DRF who first spotted the issue: the race wasn’t run at the planned one-and-one-eighth-mile distance, but instead over one and one-sixteenth miles. As soon as the error was noticed, they quickly updated the Equibase chart and added a note to explain what happened.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

It was made clear that the gate was set up for a start at one and one-sixteenth miles on the Mellon Turf course, instead of the planned one and one-eighth miles. So, they left out the split times and final time for now while they check the video, and they fixed the call points to match the real race distance.

According to DRF, Pat McKenna, a spokesperson for NYRA, mentioned, “NYRA is reviewing the circumstances around Race 12, which was contested at the incorrect distance of 1 1/16 miles rather than 1 1/8 miles.”

article-image

via Imago

The change in this situation, although not about who finished where, actually came from an important but anonymous error in the race distance. This mistake really changed how we see the outcome, raising questions about fairness, betting implications, and the rules in place to protect everyone involved. But, you know, this isn’t the first time it’s happened at that racecourse.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Saratoga is filled with horse racing controversies

So, back in August 2018, there was a pretty big mix-up at Saratoga quite similar to this one. The starting gate got set up wrong, which led to a race running at 1 1/8 miles instead of the planned 1 1/16 miles. Quite the blunder, right? It’s surprising that the track personnel missed the error before the race started—only the oddly off-balance fractional times tipped off the observers to the mistake.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

What’s your perspective on:

Saratoga's blunder: Is horse racing's credibility at stake with repeated distance errors?

Have an interesting take?

This situation led to an investigation by the New York State Gaming Commission, sparking some questions about how accountable and collaborative the officials involved really are. Aside from this major mistake, the story suggests that these big errors take the spotlight away from the bigger, underlying issues with race timing in the industry.

But the main problem these incidents point to is the industry’s lack of motivation to tackle these long-standing discrepancies. This really raises questions about how accurately the sport of horse racing can measure how far and how fast equines actually run.

ADVERTISEMENT

0
  Debate

"Saratoga's blunder: Is horse racing's credibility at stake with repeated distance errors?"

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT