‘Would’ve Stopped at 17 Slams’ – Seeking to Establish a Big 3 Fact, German Tennis Veteran Makes an Astonishing Roger Federer Statement

In the world of tennis, an opponent is the greatest instigator of fire. No one knows this better than the legends of the sport who shared unique rivalries with their fellow stars, like Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal. Though the two superstars claimed almost every accolade available in the tennis world, a former player believes that wouldn’t have been possible if not for their rivals. It is none other than the new voice in the chorus of tennis experts, Andrea Petkovic.

In a recent appearance on Tennis Channel’s Inside-In Podcast, Petkovic dropped a bombshell. She said that Roger Federer‘s collection of Grand Slam titles would have been only 17 if not for the competitive spirit of both Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic.

How Nadal and Djokovic catapulted Roger Federer’s game

Young talents like Carlos Alcaraz are making waves, and some people think that if they dominate for a long time without serious competition, their growth as players might be limited. The example of the “Big 3” in tennis history: Federer, Nadal and Djokovic, was used to emphasize this point.

Focusing on the main point, Petkovic talked about the Swiss Maestro Roger Federer. In 2009, Federer surpassed Pete Sampras’ record, which was a huge deal at the time. But Petkovic asks us to think about something important: What if the strong competitors Nadal and Djokovic hadn’t come into the picture? According to Petkovic, the answer is pretty clear: Federer wouldn’t have won as many Grand Slam titles, stopping at just 17, and we wouldn’t have seen the incredible success he’s had since then.

“If Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic hadn’t appeared on the tour, he would’ve stopped at 17 [Grand Slam titles]. A 100%. We would’ve never seen these numbers,” Petkovic asserted.

But how did the other panelist and Petkovic land in this conversation and eventually came to this conclusion?

Petkovic on rivalries in tennis

Petkovic began by telling the story of Iga Swiatek, the current WTA World No. 1. She pointed out that facing tough opponents could be a good thing for Swiatek because it challenges her to be a better player as well. Petkovic herself has been in the tennis world for nearly two decades and understands how an opponent can be a driving force.

Petkovic’s problems are the ones many tennis enthusiasts see. The prospect of dominating the tour for years with no competition to raise questions about their development as players. It’s a concern that has its roots in the history of tennis, where competition has often been a raw material for champions.

ALSO READ: ‘Lucky’ Roger Federer Content With His Career As He Gives a Philosophical Touch to Life Post Retirement – ‘I Want To Think Long and Hard..’

This idea makes us think about how the presence of strong rivals can push even the greatest players to achieve more. Federer is undoubtedly a tennis legend, but facing tough opponents like Nadal and Djokovic brought out the best in him, leading to his incredible achievements.

So here’s to the rivalries that spark greatness, to the thrilling matches that shape history, and to the ever-evolving landscape of tennis, where champions are forged not just by their own brilliance but by the relentless pursuit of greatness by those who stand across the net.

WATCH THIS STORY: Roger Federer Pulling Off ‘GOAT Sh*t’ With Absolute Ease Against a Helpless Nick Kyrgios Leaves Tennis Fans in Splits