
Imago
Credit: American Cars And Racing

Imago
Credit: American Cars And Racing
Imagine the electric buzz at Bowman Gray Stadium last February, where Chase Elliott’s hard-fought Clash victory sent 20,000 fans into a frenzy on the snarling quarter-mile bullring. That raw, chaotic night felt like NASCAR’s perfect throwback hit. And now, NASCAR plans to come back there again in 2026. Is that a good idea? Fans don’t think so.
Watch What’s Trending Now!
Reports of a 2026 repeat at the same “Madhouse” venue have slammed the series as tone-deaf, sparking a social media firestorm from furious fans, who are upset about the recycled choice instead of an innovative option.
ADVERTISEMENT
Cook Out’s venue repeat sparks outrage
“We don’t race in stadiums like this so it’s just really cool and I appreciate y’all (the fans) for making that moment special for me and my team,” Chase Elliott said in a post-race interview after his victory in Bowman Gray earlier this year in July.
Reports surfaced in July confirming NASCAR’s plan to anchor the 2026 Clash back at Bowman Gray Stadium on February 1, just two weeks before the Daytona 500. FOX Sports was given the job to handle the broadcast duties and a temporary track setup encircling the football field once more.
This marked a sequel to the 2025 debut, where Cup Series cars, next-gen machines not built for such tight confines, delivered door-slamming mayhem on the historic “Madhouse” oval, NASCAR’s first weekly venue event since 1937 and a nod to its Winston-Salem grassroots origins under the sanctioning body’s recent ownership shift.
ADVERTISEMENT

Imago
NASCAR, Motorsport, USA Clash at Bowman Gray Feb 2, 2025 WInston-Salem, North Carolina, USA NASCAR Cup Series driver Chase Elliot 9 and NASCAR Cup Series driver Chris Buescher 17 lead the field during the Clash at Bowman Gray at Bowman Gray Stadium. WInston-Salem Bowman Gray Stadium North Carolina USA, EDITORIAL USE ONLY PUBLICATIONxINxGERxSUIxAUTxONLY Copyright: xPeterxCaseyx 20250203_pjc_bc1_318
Critics were quick to attack the decision, calling it a tone-deaf move that came out of the blue after the 2025 sellout’s novelty had changed very quickly into fatigue; fans had warmed up to the short-track frenzy at first, but repetition just feels stale now.
ADVERTISEMENT
The basic complaints come down to a handful of main points: there are already too many races in the Southeast. Cup cars seem to be going slowly and are wreck-prone at 80-90 mph on the tight layout instead of flying over high-bank ovals. Plus, the dreams for big new spots like Brazil or bigger stadiums got canceled because of the cost.
Joey Dennewitz, NASCAR Regional’s managing director, described it as a tribute to “the original home of grassroots racing,” focusing on the saving of money as there was no need for a large piece of infrastructure like the modular build of the Coliseum.
However, the online anger unfairly portrayed it as a conservative money-saving measure, especially after the company had to deal with financial strains caused by antitrust lawsuits, the unsuccessful expansion in Brazil, and the Denny Hamlin-Michael Jordan ventures that are consuming the budgets.
ADVERTISEMENT
A great number of people on different platforms were accusing NASCAR of going back to a trick that once made fans happy, but now is in danger of losing a divided base even before the announcement of the 2026 schedule. Let’s see what fans had to say about this.
Top Stories
Florida Police Arrest Millionaire NASCAR Veteran Over Disturbing Public Misbehavior

Denny Hamlin Demands Immediate Apology From FOX Broadcaster After Michael Jordan’s Lawsuit Triumph

Hailie Deegan & Others Speculated to Fill NASCAR Seat After Star Driver’s Ugly Exit

Departing NASCAR Star’s Father Pens Emotional Note After Parting Ways with Dale Jr.

Dale Jr. Details NASCAR’s Massive Blunder in Savage Takedown of Leadership Decisions

Fans are not happy with the clash venue
Fans flooded Reddit’s thread on the Clash venue reports, unleashing a torrent of reactions that exposed the sport’s passionate, polarized base just months after Elliott’s 2025 victory lap at the same track drew 20,000-plus spectators.
ADVERTISEMENT
One user vented, “The amount of complaining about the clash being at Bowman Gray just proves that nascar will never make anyone happy,” capturing the no-win bind as the event’s sellout hype collided head-on with demands for variety in an era of shrinking schedules and rising ticket prices.
Practical woes fueled the fire amid NASCAR’s venue constraints: “Not sure where else they’d go if they want to keep the quarter mile stadium track idea. Only football stadiums you could sell enough tickets to justify building a temporary track would be Bank of America or maybe Mercedes Benz, but then everybody would go back to bitching about another race in the southeast.”
This highlighted logistical headaches, like the multimillion-dollar temp track costs that ruled out most NFL sites, while tying backlash to the Southeast-heavy calendar that already packs Darlington, Bristol, and North Wilkesboro.
ADVERTISEMENT
Frustration boiled over the racing product itself, with the 2025 Clash’s 75-lap format yielding endless cautions and minimal passing.
“I guess I’m in the minority, but I am over these tiny little bullring tracks, with the cup cars just slamming into each other and going NOWHERE,” one fan griped, echoing complaints about Next Gen aero drag turning the Madhouse into a demolition derby rather than a speed showcase. Especially when fans pine for contrasts like the L.A. Coliseum’s straightaway sprints.
A pinch of humor was also there, “We would have gone to Brazil but MJ and Denny took all our money,” a jab at Hamlin and Jordan’s 23XI Racing empire and the scrapped international push amid economic headwinds.
ADVERTISEMENT
Another quipped, “Not the ‘Bowman returns 2027’ news I was hoping for but I’ll allow it,” grudgingly accepting the repeat while dreaming of permanence.
Another fan wrapped it up: “Lame, but probably expected if we’re being a more cost-conscious after the trial,” nodding to NASCAR’s antitrust settlement thriftiness that prioritizes proven attractions over risky new ideas in a post-2025 landscape.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

