feature-image

Imago

feature-image

Imago

When someone is adamant that Fernando Mendoza is not the right fit for the Raiders, it’s bound to get tricky for them later on. Former Detroit Lions quarterback Dan Orlovsky, who is the most vocal figure of this train of thought, is facing the heat at his own network. But he refuses to back down from his point of view, and still believes that there is a better fit for the Raiders at quarterback in the draft.

Watch What’s Trending Now!

Orlovsky has long favored Alabama’s Ty Simpson as the better fit over Mendoza, even though there is an overwhelming majority of experts who have pitched the Indiana QB as the No. 1 pick. Team co-owner Tom Brady likes Mendoza, and it’s really a waiting game until the draft for Mendoza to suit up in Raiders colors. But to Dan Orlovsky, Ty Simpson is still the better quarterback for the team.

ADVERTISEMENT

“People won’t say it, I will, Ty Simpson schematically is a better fit or marriage for what the Las Vegas Raiders would do under Klint Kubiak than Fernando Mendoza,” the analyst said. “Most of the things that he does, at least half of the things that he does from a scheme standpoint are underneath the centre… Fernando Mendoza took five snaps total from underneath the centre in his college career.”

Orlovsky came prepared for this one. Since Kubik Klint became an offensive coordinator. 51% of his offenses’ snaps have come from under center. Mendoza has played shotgun throughout most of his career. Playing under center is key in the league, and it’s something the QB has to work on. Orlovsky figured that Mendoza would still need two to three years to work this out.

ADVERTISEMENT

Which Prospects should OSU target next?

Let Tony do the scouting, you just make the pick.

Ty Simpson, on the other hand, is experienced in playing under center. He checks the box for teams that prefer their quarterback at this position, including the Raiders. But Simpson loses out to Mendoza in terms of starting experience, having been one for only one full season. Even in stature and arm strength-wise, the Indiana QB is the better candidate. Simpson is the clear QB2 in the 2026 draft, which is why Orlovsky’s support matters. This puts the Raiders in a conundrum: do they go for the quarterback who is not Mendoza, but has played under center, or do they draft Mendoza and wait for him to adjust to playing under center?

ADVERTISEMENT

Whatever the team does, however, doesn’t help Orlovsky put out the fire he is left to face at ESPN. ESPN might not return the members of its No. 2 NFL booth, which are Orlovsky, Chris Fowler, and Louis Riddick Jr., as part of its new merger with the NFL Network. Whether or not Orlovsky’s support for Simpson going to the Raiders has played into this is not known, but it has created a lot of public disdain for him and the network. Stephen A. Smith, however, is batting for him.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dan Orlovsky sees support from Stephen A. Smith after ESPN troubles

According to The Athletic’s Andrew Marchand, ESPN is considering such a move because scheduling problems would arise if this secondary team is charged with the coverage of international games. Most of NFL Network’s coverage happens overseas, which would impact the routines of Fowler and Orlovsky. But Smith sent a message to ESPN in support of Dan.

“To the bosses at ESPN, we need to cherish the people that we have. I don’t think Dan Orlovsky’s gonna be here too much longer, because this man knows his damn football, and somebody’s gonna get smart enough and scoop him up,” said Smith.

ADVERTISEMENT

Orlovsky may not be off the network entirely. Just this week, ESPN had Dan’s son, Madden, participate in a short but emotional segment in honor of World Autism Day. It had the Orlovsky in tears, and the segment was a hit. But how long can the network withstand his bold takes on Fernando Mendoza?

ADVERTISEMENT

Appearing on the Pat McAfee show, Dan Orlovsky also claimed that Ty Simpson has played bigger games than National Championship winner Fernando Mendoza. Simpson struggled in the SEC Championship game and in the Rose Bowl, seeing no success in the postseason as such. But according to Orlovsky, Mendoza’s worth as a ‘big game’ player was not as much, referring to Indiana having just six points on the board through three quarters in the National Championship game.

Remarks like that might be forcing ESPN to think carefully about the controversial analyst now.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Share this with a friend:

Link Copied!

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Written by

author-image

Isha Bharadwj

14 Articles

Isha Bhardwj is a College Football Journalist at EssentiallySports, where she covers the sport with a focus on tactical nuance, player dynamics, and the stories that unfold beyond the field. Her work blends sharp analysis with context-driven storytelling, offering readers a deeper understanding of both the game itself and the ecosystem around it. With years of experience as an athlete, Isha brings a lived understanding of the aggression, discipline, and emotional intensity that define team sports. This background shapes her writing, allowing her to approach college football with authenticity and insight. With a degree in Political Science and a law degree underway, her academic journey adds another layer to her perspective—helping her examine not just what happens during games, but the structures, decisions, and narratives that shape them. At EssentiallySports, Isha focuses on delivering coverage that goes beyond the scoreboard, capturing both the action on the field and the drama that unfolds when the cameras are off.

Know more

Edited by

editor-image

Afreen Kabir

ADVERTISEMENT