
via Imago
August 24, 2024, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA: August 24, 2024: George Pickens 14 during the Pittsburgh Steelers vs Detroit Lions at Ford Field in Detroit MI. Brook Ward / Pittsburgh USA – ZUMAa234 20240824_zsa_a234_651 Copyright: xAMGx

via Imago
August 24, 2024, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA: August 24, 2024: George Pickens 14 during the Pittsburgh Steelers vs Detroit Lions at Ford Field in Detroit MI. Brook Ward / Pittsburgh USA – ZUMAa234 20240824_zsa_a234_651 Copyright: xAMGx
When the Pittsburgh Steelers traded wide receiver George Pickens to the Dallas Cowboys a few weeks after the draft, it caused a stir in the NFL. In three seasons, Pickens, a 2022 second-round selection, showed signs of exceptional talent with 2,841 receiving yards and 12 touchdowns. However, the big plays came with a price: frequent run-ins with discipline, emotional outbursts, and sideline scuffles.
The deal, finalized on May 7, sent Pickens and a 2027 sixth-rounder to Dallas in exchange for a 2026 third-round pick and a 2027 fifth-round pick. Given that Pittsburgh had just signed veteran wide receiver DK Metcalf in a historic contract with Seattle, the move was somehow expected. However, there were questions raised throughout the league: Given the uncertainty surrounding wideout depth, why would a team deal away a top-producing receiver?
Steelers general manager Omar Khan corrected the record regarding the sudden trade in a rare post-draft media appearance. In a video that the team shared on May 10, Khan informed reporters, “The trade sort of happened quickly…The Cowboys reached out earlier this week… We had conversations internally. I also spoke with George’s agent, Dave. We talked about where things had been, where they were, and where they could go. A fresh start made sense for everyone.” Although Khan acknowledged that talks over the receiver’s future had been going on, he stressed that Pickens never asked for a trade. “I was never told that he wanted to leave, no,” he emphasized.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Pittsburgh Steelers GM Omar Khan on why they traded WR George Pickens to the Cowboys: “The trade sort of happened quickly. We had some people inquire during the draft. Nothing that really made sense. The Cowboys reached out earlier this week. They proposed something for us to…
— Jon Machota (@jonmachota) May 9, 2025
He maintained that the choice was well-considered and not made on the spur of the moment. But it was the timing that drew criticism. Pickens’ departure prompted quick criticism of Pittsburgh’s receiving corps, which was compared to last year’s small lineup following a failed attempt at Brandon Aiyuk. Their prior offseason had featured a months-long pursuit of 49ers star Brandon Aiyuk, which failed when San Francisco locked him into a $120 million extension. Now, with Pickens gone, the Steelers appear to be right back where they started.
But Khan pointed to a series of moves made to reinforce the group. “We wouldn’t have done this if we didn’t feel good about the receiver situation,” he stated. He cited the trade for DK Metcalf, the inclusion of veteran Robert Woods, and Roman Wilson’s development as causes for hope. But there are still unanswered questions. Wilson hasn’t played a down, and Woods is 33. Although Khan understood the risk, he did not rule out adding more players: “If there’s an opportunity to add a playmaker… We’ll look into it.” For now, the Steelers are betting on balance over star power.
While the Steelers tried to persuade the public that they were still set at wideout, NFL executive offices were responding to the Pickens deal in quite different ways. In fact, some teams reportedly laughed at the concept when Pittsburgh discreetly started shopping for Pickens during the draft.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
What’s your perspective on:
Did the Steelers just gamble their future by trading Pickens, or is this a masterstroke?
Have an interesting take?
NFL Teams mocked the idea of trading for George Pickens
Jeff Howe of The Athletic claims that a number of NFL teams had little interest in Pickens. According to Howe, “Word leaked during the draft that Pickens was available if anyone wanted him. Some teams polled by The Athletic at the time laughed at the idea of inviting Pickens into their locker room for any price, let alone a second-day draft pick.” Despite his undeniable production—nearly 3,000 yards in three years—Pickens’ off-field issues clearly scared off suitors.
During his tenure in Pittsburgh, George Pickens had a number of high-profile incidents that caused concern throughout the league. Pickens’ unsportsmanlike act of grabbing cornerback Jourdan Lewis by the facemask and pulling him down during Week 5 against the Cowboys last year, after a frustrating defeat, garnered media attention. After that game, head coach Mike Tomlin said bluntly, “He’s got a target on his back because he’s George. He understands that. But he’s got to grow up. He’s got to grow up in a hurry.” Things didn’t get any better as the season came to an end. In Week 16 against the Chiefs on Christmas Day. Pickens showed up late to the game. Arriving only 95 minutes before kickoff.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
And these weren’t isolated incidents. They depicted a player who was on the verge of becoming a team liability, even though he has star potential. Still, the Cowboys bit. They saw value, though the league was hesitant. They discovered a WR2 with explosive ability, with some behavioural risk. So, the George Pickens trade was ultimately a vote on risk, chemistry, and organisational identity. The Steelers chose stability. The Cowboys chose upside. Only time will tell who was right.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Did the Steelers just gamble their future by trading Pickens, or is this a masterstroke?